stdcxx-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Martin Sebor <mse...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Building stdcxx-4.2.1 Using MinGW+MSYS On Windows XP (SP2)
Date Fri, 28 Nov 2008 00:21:04 GMT
Farid Zaripov wrote:
>> Although it probably shouldn't be called liblibstd, should it?
>> What's with the duplicate "lib" part?
> 
>   I think you should know, that the library file located in lib subdirectory ;)
> 
>   I suppose that there missed '/' after the first 'lib': /stdcxx-4.2.2/build/lib/libstd.a
> 
>   And what I don't like is that when BUILDTYPE is not specified, the name of library
file is always
> libstd.{a;so} for any possible BUILDMODE values (even for empty BUILDMODE). The comments
> in GNUMakefile says that BUILDTYPE and BUILDMODE both are optional and by default will
be
> used 11s, but this is not true...

We should fix the text. When you don't specify either you get neither
debugging (i.e., no -g) nor optimization (i.e., no -O). I.e., you get
whatever the default invocation of the compiler gives you with no
options.

Martin

> 
> Farid.


Mime
View raw message