stdcxx-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Martin Sebor <>
Subject Re: RFC: stdcxx 4.2 platforms
Date Tue, 13 Mar 2007 17:37:43 GMT
Farid Zaripov wrote:
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Martin Sebor [] 
>> Sent: Monday, March 12, 2007 8:34 PM
>> To:
>> Subject: Re: RFC: stdcxx 4.2 platforms
>>> I would find Cygwin test results helpful. It would also be 
>> helpful do semi-regular builds of some popular C++ software 
>> with stdcxx (like boost) and post the results.
>> I agree that building Boost (and perhaps other popular 
>> packages as well) would be a useful enhancement to the stdcxx 
>> test suite.
>> The problem is first of all porting Boost to stdcxx (i.e., 
>> getting the infrastructure to work), and then also the cycles 
>> involved in running the Boost test suite and analyzing the 
>> test results. I suppose if someone were to volunteer to do 
>> the first pass (i.e., get the Boost infrastructure ported and 
>> help analyze the first set of results) we could then add it 
>> to our automated test infrastructure and run it perhaps not 
>> every night but maybe weekly or monthly and handle the 
>> maintenance of the project.
>   I would like to do that, if there is no objection.

That would be great! If you need help ask on of the Boost
mailing lists:

The Boost maintainers might be interested in integrating
the results of your work into their build infrastructure
to make it easier for users to build their software with

I'm CC'ing stdcxx-user in case someone on that list who
isn't subscribed to stdcxx-dev has any suggestions or
comments on the subject.


View raw message