stdcxx-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Pete Robbins" <robbin...@googlemail.com>
Subject Re: Problem building Tuscany SDO with stdcxx on Linux
Date Wed, 04 Oct 2006 10:21:43 GMT
The Tuscany build has AM_CONFIG_HEADER(config.h) in the configure.ac file.
This generates a config.h. We don't need this so the line can be removed.

Cheers,


On 03/10/06, Martin Sebor <sebor@roguewave.com> wrote:
>
> Geoffrey Winn wrote:
> > On 02/10/06, *Martin Sebor* <sebor@roguewave.com
> > <mailto:sebor@roguewave.com>> wrote:
> >
> [...]
> > I checked the config.log file and I get a warning rather than an error.
> > I've attached a zipped form of the config file to this note in case it's
> > any help. I've also run the SIZE_T test by hand and it seems to run
> > fine. The output is as follows.
>
> That looks good, _RWSTD_PTRDIFF_T is being #defined. I wonder if
> there is another config.h that's getting #included instead of ours
> (it would reside in ./ or in ../../../../.. since those two are
> before $BUILDDIR/include on the preprocessor search path; btw.,
> it's better to have stdcxx paths first).
>
> Preprocessing ChangedDataObjectListImpl.cpp with -E should reveal
> which config.h is being used. Alternatively, you can recompile it
> with stdcxx paths first in the preprocessor search path to see if
> it helps.
>
> FWIW, config.h doesn't seem to be the best name since it's
> apparently pretty common in other libraries. We plan to rename
> it to something else (or change the way it's included) in the
> next release.
>
> Martin
>



-- 
Pete

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message