Return-Path: 
 <stdcxx-user-return-58-apmail-incubator-stdcxx-user-archive=incubator.apache.org@incubator.apache.org>
Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-stdcxx-user-archive@www.apache.org
Received: (qmail 15663 invoked from network); 14 Feb 2006 20:01:27 -0000
Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199)
  by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 14 Feb 2006 20:01:27 -0000
Received: (qmail 77802 invoked by uid 500); 14 Feb 2006 20:01:27 -0000
Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-stdcxx-user-archive@incubator.apache.org
Received: (qmail 77783 invoked by uid 500); 14 Feb 2006 20:01:26 -0000
Mailing-List: contact stdcxx-user-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:stdcxx-user-help@incubator.apache.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:stdcxx-user-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org>
List-Post: <mailto:stdcxx-user@incubator.apache.org>
List-Id: <stdcxx-user.incubator.apache.org>
Reply-To: stdcxx-user@incubator.apache.org
Delivered-To: mailing list stdcxx-user@incubator.apache.org
Received: (qmail 77772 invoked by uid 99); 14 Feb 2006 20:01:26 -0000
Received: from asf.osuosl.org (HELO asf.osuosl.org) (140.211.166.49)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 14 Feb 2006 12:01:26 -0800
X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.9 required=10.0
	tests=DNS_FROM_RFC_ABUSE,DNS_FROM_RFC_POST,HTML_MESSAGE
X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org
Received-SPF: neutral (asf.osuosl.org: local policy)
Received: from [209.191.86.99] (HELO web82204.mail.mud.yahoo.com)
 (209.191.86.99)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Tue, 14 Feb 2006 12:01:25 -0800
Received: (qmail 2258 invoked by uid 60001); 14 Feb 2006 19:59:04 -0000
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws;
  s=s1024; d=sbcglobal.net;
  h=Message-ID:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding;
  b=cm2k0h/kkrhkIB0MppNChtcDs3bXnt+7PkBLmYdjNpFuzVsTajBGjrb1cs3QfaOLexVlP7kllu2xP+8gKimwxWFYBzMIwG5LezaHd7SGdVlmstfeAjasTopbpBNxGxwQ1tedfnPh5U5vEgHW8cS07CxEnxbG3T7wK+t310wL5EQ=
  ;
Message-ID: <20060214195904.2256.qmail@web82204.mail.mud.yahoo.com>
Received: from [208.8.57.2] by web82204.mail.mud.yahoo.com via HTTP;
 Tue, 14 Feb 2006 11:59:04 PST
Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2006 11:59:04 -0800 (PST)
From: Dipak Bapatla <deepak_boost@sbcglobal.net>
Subject: Re: Errors compiling examples - Sun studio 11
To: stdcxx-user@incubator.apache.org
In-Reply-To: <43F21420.9050505@roguewave.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0-211328267-1139947144=:2016"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org
X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N

--0-211328267-1139947144=:2016
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

I have changed the code as follows in the two definitions in _tree.h to get the examples to compile.
      const_iterator _C_make_iter (const _C_link_t __node) const {
        return const_iterator (*this, _C_tree_citer (__node));
    }

      to 
   
      const_iterator _C_make_iter (_C_link_t __node) const {
        return const_iterator (*this, _C_tree_citer (__node));
    }

 Removed the const from the parameter type. 
   
  It is weird that the compiler complained about the code because I have the test program below and it works fine as expected.
   
  #include <iostream>

  class Hello {
   public:
   int num(int a) { return 1; };
   int num(const int a) const { return 3; }
};
   
  int main(int argc, char** argv)
{
  Hello a;
  const Hello b = a;
  int k=3;
  std::cout << a.num(k) << std::endl;
  std::cout << b.num(k) << std::endl;
}

  macms01$ ./testit
1
3
   
  Martin Sebor <sebor@roguewave.com> wrote:
  Dipak Bapatla wrote:
> CC: Sun C++ 5.8 Patch 121017-01 2005/12/11

So it looks like we have the vanilla 5.8 and you are have a patched
version of the same. I don't think I can get this version installed
here anytime soon to reduce the error to a small enough test case
to put together and test a workaround for you but I can suggest one.

Rename the const overload of _C_make_iter to _C_make_const_iter (or
something similarly unique), and replace all calls to it (i.e., all
calls from other __rw_tree const member functions) with those to the
renamed function.

Martin


> 
> Martin Sebor wrote: Dipak Bapatla wrote:
> 
>>Hi,
>>
>>The same error shows up with around three or four examples. 
> 
> 
> The error is obviously bogus. It says there is an ambiguity between
> 
> __rb_tree::_C_make_iter (__rw_rb_tree_node*)
> 
> and
> 
> __rb_tree::_C_make_iter (const __rw_rb_tree_node*) const
> 
> There is no ambiguity between the two and I'm not seeing any errors
> in my build. What exactly is the CC version you are using? Mine is
> 
> $ CC -V
> CC: Sun C++ 5.8 2005/10/13
> 
> Martin
> 
> 
> 

  


--0-211328267-1139947144=:2016--