stdcxx-issues mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Travis Vitek (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] Resolved: (STDCXX-898) [MSVC] 18.numeric.special.int test fails
Date Fri, 30 May 2008 23:12:45 GMT

     [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STDCXX-898?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]

Travis Vitek resolved STDCXX-898.
---------------------------------

    Resolution: Fixed

Committed to 4.2.x in [r661910|http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=661910&view=rev].

> [MSVC] 18.numeric.special.int test fails
> ----------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: STDCXX-898
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STDCXX-898
>             Project: C++ Standard Library
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: Tests
>    Affects Versions: 4.2.1
>         Environment: MSVC
>            Reporter: Farid Zaripov
>            Assignee: Travis Vitek
>            Priority: Trivial
>             Fix For: 4.2.2
>
>   Original Estimate: 1h
>          Time Spent: 2h
>  Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
> The 18.numeric.special.int test fails with the following assertions:
> {noformat}
> # ASSERTION (S7) (4 lines):
> # TEXT: std::numeric_limits<bool>::traps == 0, got true
> # CLAUSE: numeric.special
> # LINE: 587
> # ASSERTION (S7) (4 lines):
> # TEXT: std::numeric_limits<char>::traps == 0, got true
> # CLAUSE: numeric.special
> # LINE: 587
> # ASSERTION (S7) (4 lines):
> # TEXT: std::numeric_limits<signed char>::traps == 0, got true
> # CLAUSE: numeric.special
> # LINE: 587
> # ASSERTION (S7) (4 lines):
> # TEXT: std::numeric_limits<unsigned char>::traps == 0, got true
> # CLAUSE: numeric.special
> # LINE: 587
> # ASSERTION (S7) (4 lines):
> # TEXT: std::numeric_limits<short>::traps == 0, got true
> # CLAUSE: numeric.special
> # LINE: 587
> # ASSERTION (S7) (4 lines):
> # TEXT: std::numeric_limits<unsigned short>::traps == 0, got true
> # CLAUSE: numeric.special
> # LINE: 587
> # ASSERTION (S7) (4 lines):
> # TEXT: std::numeric_limits<int>::traps == 0, got true
> # CLAUSE: numeric.special
> # LINE: 587
> # ASSERTION (S7) (4 lines):
> # TEXT: std::numeric_limits<unsigned int>::traps == 0, got true
> # CLAUSE: numeric.special
> # LINE: 587
> # ASSERTION (S7) (4 lines):
> # TEXT: std::numeric_limits<long>::traps == 0, got true
> # CLAUSE: numeric.special
> # LINE: 587
> # ASSERTION (S7) (4 lines):
> # TEXT: std::numeric_limits<unsigned long>::traps == 0, got true
> # CLAUSE: numeric.special
> # LINE: 587
> # ASSERTION (S7) (4 lines):
> # TEXT: std::numeric_limits<_RWSTD_LONG_LONG>::traps == 0, got true
> # CLAUSE: numeric.special
> # LINE: 587
> # ASSERTION (S7) (4 lines):
> # TEXT: std::numeric_limits<unsigned _RWSTD_LONG_LONG>::traps == 0, got true
> # CLAUSE: numeric.special
> # LINE: 587
> # ASSERTION (S7) (4 lines):
> # TEXT: std::numeric_limits<wchar_t>::traps == 0, got true
> # CLAUSE: numeric.special
> # LINE: 587
> {noformat}
>   Problem is in that the test unconditionally expects that numeric_limits<>::traps
is false for all integral types. Perhaps we need to hardcode the expected results depending
on the platform (as done in 18.numeric.special.float test).

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.


Mime
View raw message