stdcxx-issues mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Martin Sebor (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] Commented: (STDCXX-261) runall should parse tests and examples in the same manner
Date Wed, 12 Mar 2008 03:40:49 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STDCXX-261?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12577688#action_12577688
] 

Martin Sebor commented on STDCXX-261:
-------------------------------------

We might want to consider this when extending the Expected Failure feature to handle failed
test assertions since we'll most likely be changing the format of the test driver output.

> runall should parse tests and examples in the same manner
> ---------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: STDCXX-261
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STDCXX-261
>             Project: C++ Standard Library
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: Build
>    Affects Versions: 4.1.3, 4.2.0
>            Reporter: Andrew Black
>            Priority: Minor
>             Fix For: 4.3
>
>   Original Estimate: 16h
>  Remaining Estimate: 16h
>
> At this time, several of the self tests (0.cmdopts.out, 0.printf.out, 0.strncmp.out,
0.valcmp.out) produce output that lacks a summary section.
> The runall.sh (or runall.c) utility should be able to compare the output of these tests
against a reference file in the same manner that the output is compared for examples.
> An extension of this concept is that it might make sense to unify the logic used to check
the test and example results, so that the same process would be used for both tests and examples.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.


Mime
View raw message