stdcxx-issues mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Travis Vitek (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] Commented: (STDCXX-625) [IBM XLC++ 9.0/AIX 5.3] SIGSEGV in 0.process
Date Mon, 04 Feb 2008 22:41:08 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STDCXX-625?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12565579#action_12565579
] 

Travis Vitek commented on STDCXX-625:
-------------------------------------

Committed to trunk in [r618385|http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=618385&view=rev]
Merged to 4.2.x in [r618388|http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=618388&view=rev]

> [IBM XLC++ 9.0/AIX 5.3] SIGSEGV in 0.process
> --------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: STDCXX-625
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STDCXX-625
>             Project: C++ Standard Library
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: Tests
>    Affects Versions: 4.2.0
>         Environment: HP-UX or AIX platforms
>            Reporter: Travis Vitek
>            Assignee: Travis Vitek
>             Fix For: 4.2.1
>
>         Attachments: stdcxx-625.patch, test.cpp
>
>
> It appears that when we re-register for the signal from within the user signal handler
the user signal handler is immediately invoked again. This recursion causes a stack overflow
and a crash. Here is the stack on AIX....
> {noformat}
> sig_handler(int)( = 20), line 528 in "process.cpp"
> sigaction(??, ??, ??) at 0xd01fa358
> signal(??, ??) at 0xd02759a8
> sig_handler(int)( = 20), line 528 in "process.cpp"
> sigaction(??, ??, ??) at 0xd01fa358
> signal(??, ??) at 0xd02759a8
> sig_handler(int)( = 20), line 528 in "process.cpp"
> nsleep(??, ??) at 0xd01fa1d4
> sleep(??) at 0xd02051d4
> unnamed block $b656, line 553 in "process.cpp"
> rw_waitpid(long,int*,int)(pid = 782442, result = 0x2ff226a0, timeout = 5), line 553 in
"process.cpp"
> join_test(long,bool)(pid = 782442, should_hang = false), line 51 in "0.process.cpp"
> test_process_create1()(), line 109 in "0.process.cpp"
> run_test(int,char**)(argc = 1, argv = 0x2ff22a60), line 276 in "0.process.cpp"
> rw_vtest(int,char**,const char*,const char*,const char*,int(*)(int,char**),const char*,char*)(argc
= 1, argv = 0x2ff22a60, file_name = "/amd/devco/vitek/stdcxx-trunk/tests/self/0.process.cpp",
clause = "0.process", comment = "", fun = 0x2000b85c, optstr = "|-child#0 |-timeout#", va
= " "), line 1030 in "driver.cpp"
> rw_test(int,char**,const char*,const char*,const char*,int(*)(int,char**),const char*,...)(argc
= 1, argv = 0x2ff22a60, fname = "/amd/devco/vitek/stdcxx-trunk/tests/self/0.process.cpp",
clause = "0.process", comment = "", testfun = 0x2000b85c, optstr = "|-child#0 |-timeout#",
... = 0x20009608), line 1128 in "driver.cpp"
> main(argc = 1, argv = 0x2ff22a60), line 299 in "0.process.cpp"
> {noformat}
> Here is the stack on HP-UX
> {noformat}
> #0  sig_handler (No.Identifier=18) at /amd/devco/vitek/stdcxx-trunk/tests/src/process.cpp:529
> #1  <signal handler called>
> #2  0x7b0086c0 in _sigvector+0x10 () from /usr/lib/libc.2
> #3  0x7b00f114 in signalvector+0xac () from /usr/lib/libc.2
> #4  0x7b00f020 in signal+0xa0 () from /usr/lib/libc.2
> #5  0x187fc in sig_handler (No.Identifier=18) at /amd/devco/vitek/stdcxx-trunk/tests/src/process.cpp:529
> #6  <signal handler called>
> #7  0x7b0086c0 in _sigvector+0x10 () from /usr/lib/libc.2
> #8  0x7b00f114 in signalvector+0xac () from /usr/lib/libc.2
> #9  0x7b00f020 in signal+0xa0 () from /usr/lib/libc.2
> #10 0x187fc in sig_handler (No.Identifier=18) at /amd/devco/vitek/stdcxx-trunk/tests/src/process.cpp:529
> #11 <signal handler called>
> #12 0x7b0086c0 in _sigvector+0x10 () from /usr/lib/libc.2
> #13 0x7b00f114 in signalvector+0xac () from /usr/lib/libc.2
> #14 0x7b00f020 in signal+0xa0 () from /usr/lib/libc.2
> #15 0x187fc in sig_handler (No.Identifier=18) at /amd/devco/vitek/stdcxx-trunk/tests/src/process.cpp:529
> #16 <signal handler called>
> #17 0x7b0086c0 in _sigvector+0x10 () from /usr/lib/libc.2
> #18 0x7b00f114 in signalvector+0xac () from /usr/lib/libc.2
> #19 0x7b00f020 in signal+0xa0 () from /usr/lib/libc.2
> #20 0x187fc in sig_handler (No.Identifier=18) at /amd/devco/vitek/stdcxx-trunk/tests/src/process.cpp:529
> #21 <signal handler called>
> #22 0x7b00a160 in __sigtimedwait_sys+0x10 () from /usr/lib/libc.2
> #23 0x7b013c84 in sigtimedwait+0x6c () from /usr/lib/libc.2
> #24 0x7afa2a50 in sleep+0xe8 () from /usr/lib/libc.2
> #25 0x188f0 in rw_waitpid (pid=13825, result=0x7f7f0db0, timeout=5)
>     at /amd/devco/vitek/stdcxx-trunk/tests/src/process.cpp:555
> #26 0x15250 in join_test (pid=13825, should_hang=false) at /amd/devco/vitek/stdcxx-trunk/tests/self/0.process.cpp:51
> #27 0x15424 in test_process_create1 () at /amd/devco/vitek/stdcxx-trunk/tests/self/0.process.cpp:109
> #28 0x159b4 in run_test (argc=1, argv=0x7f7f08d4) at /amd/devco/vitek/stdcxx-trunk/tests/self/0.process.cpp:276
> #29 0x16d1c in rw_vtest (argc=1, argv=0x7f7f08d4, 
>     file_name=0x8e090 "/amd/devco/vitek/stdcxx-trunk/tests/self/0.process.cpp", clause=0x8e528
"0.process", 
>     comment=0x8e08f "", fun=0x4001ed52 <run_test(int, char **)>, optstr=0x8e534
"|-child#0 |-timeout#", va=0x7f7f0a34)
>     at /amd/devco/vitek/stdcxx-trunk/tests/src/driver.cpp:1030
> #30 0x171ec in rw_test (argc=1, argv=0x7f7f08d4, fname=0x8e090 "/amd/devco/vitek/stdcxx-trunk/tests/self/0.process.cpp",

>     clause=0x8e528 "0.process", comment=0x8e08f "", testfun=0x4001ed52 <run_test(int,
char **)>, 
>     optstr=0x8e534 "|-child#0 |-timeout#") at /amd/devco/vitek/stdcxx-trunk/tests/src/driver.cpp:1127
> #31 0x15ad4 in main (argc=1, argv=0x7f7f08d4) at /amd/devco/vitek/stdcxx-trunk/tests/self/0.process.cpp:299
> {noformat}

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.


Mime
View raw message