Return-Path: 
 <dev-return-8937-apmail-stdcxx-dev-archive=stdcxx.apache.org@stdcxx.apache.org>
X-Original-To: apmail-stdcxx-dev-archive@www.apache.org
Delivered-To: apmail-stdcxx-dev-archive@www.apache.org
Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3])
	by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id CF45E10893
	for <apmail-stdcxx-dev-archive@www.apache.org>;
 Tue,  6 Aug 2013 15:55:26 +0000 (UTC)
Received: (qmail 70992 invoked by uid 500); 6 Aug 2013 15:55:26 -0000
Delivered-To: apmail-stdcxx-dev-archive@stdcxx.apache.org
Received: (qmail 70973 invoked by uid 500); 6 Aug 2013 15:55:25 -0000
Mailing-List: contact dev-help@stdcxx.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:dev-help@stdcxx.apache.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:dev-unsubscribe@stdcxx.apache.org>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@stdcxx.apache.org>
List-Id: <dev.stdcxx.apache.org>
Reply-To: dev@stdcxx.apache.org
Delivered-To: mailing list dev@stdcxx.apache.org
Received: (qmail 70963 invoked by uid 99); 6 Aug 2013 15:55:23 -0000
Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 06 Aug 2013 15:55:23 +0000
X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0
	tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS
X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of cbergstrom@pathscale.com
 designates 209.85.220.51 as permitted sender)
Received: from [209.85.220.51] (HELO mail-pa0-f51.google.com) (209.85.220.51)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 06 Aug 2013 15:55:17 +0000
Received: by mail-pa0-f51.google.com with SMTP id lf11so906531pab.38
        for <dev@stdcxx.apache.org>; Tue, 06 Aug 2013 08:54:56 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=google.com; s=20120113;
        h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to
         :cc:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type
         :content-transfer-encoding;
        bh=VbtbysOWG3TL7QP3Pn1dL8aOL3/SYJhsW6Q0QDdt/48=;
        b=Uc7sE+k7fWip63TAzaMLftQS/FlJ9C4v+jEIxbN/F99Q+FEJAVzmAfvzBXlyELBud5
         KKIGeAM9zuP2s/R9Vd5Wx2niE46nbpA0F90qDEtZ0QdBxYifAuafH/iDtVErgS1w360E
         s4S+4aG4Cwux5tKlhCSaE7va/0DBxL25MpYHizy2+rbCB0pzwFSPQWsNWRuD4+HUXO01
         HDlZzMY6PaVoyC1gTEcBFXBpPS1H2Yuq2hDR9aNvqxs96HfYC9V3kw4F9Wckm2BFtHlm
         9GK6vD8bzKVhcorfpw6JIlyi19vCgUdhrKSXYMTUQc0wzLswd/5Uvg+C5/IjTgoFCa5O
         3G+g==
X-Gm-Message-State: 
 ALoCoQmFZxABvsOeBkjTAevFbkcClD5Ef4Is4u3ETafVWagoBj54+F4JwghbTFkeAj4MM7NsgCh5
X-Received: by 10.68.253.161 with SMTP id ab1mr2282695pbd.76.1375804496814;
        Tue, 06 Aug 2013 08:54:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.36] (ppp-124-120-144-73.revip2.asianet.co.th.
 [124.120.144.73])
        by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id
 dc5sm2710130pbc.37.2013.08.06.08.54.53
        for <multiple recipients>
        (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128);
        Tue, 06 Aug 2013 08:54:55 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <52011B38.30504@pathscale.com>
Date: Tue, 06 Aug 2013 22:50:16 +0700
From: =?UTF-8?B?IkMuIEJlcmdzdHLDtm0i?= <cbergstrom@pathscale.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; SunOS i86pc;
 rv:10.0.6esrpre) Gecko/20120731 Thunderbird/10.0.6
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: dev@stdcxx.apache.org
CC: Jim Jagielski <jim@jaguNET.com>,
 Serdar Yegulalp <serdar@genjipress.com>
Subject: Re: Fwd: [Contact] Media question
References: <E553EEA6-8D3B-4CFD-8307-B10B29AC4192@apache.org>
 <1A66BA13-C742-437F-9AA7-C2B0189150E5@jaguNET.com>
In-Reply-To: <1A66BA13-C742-437F-9AA7-C2B0189150E5@jaguNET.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org

On 08/ 6/13 09:30 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> The ASF was asked to comment on the move of the project to the Attic.
> The below is what was sent.

Wtf Jim. Are you trying to be a troll now? If you wanted your name in 
the press so badly let them publish it. Why are you even putting my name 
on this. I'm interested in open source, not open bullshit. I declined 
media comments and let this go. Please revise your statement to leave me 
out of it. (In fact I referred people to comment who would be much more 
likely to have something positive to say)

The Apache way didn't work for this project and instead of trying to 
think outside the box... Some passionate people (primarily you?) decided 
it was better to close it. (It's no secret you've wanted to do this for 
a long time and why you intentionally pissed off the previous PMC.) 
While STDCXX at Apache has no future it's still maintained by multiple 
corporations. (Who are at least willing to discuss collaborating.)

Will you hide behind private board meetings or can some redacted ‎ 
version of the minutes be released? /* I don't personally care, but 
maybe the press (Serdar) is interested */