stdcxx-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Liviu Nicoara <>
Subject Re: [PATCH] STDCXX-1073
Date Sun, 21 Oct 2012 23:59:51 GMT
On 10/21/12 19:08, Martin Sebor wrote:
> There's no requirement that embedded NULs must be preserved
> (that's just how it happens to be implemented). I find it best
> to avoid relying on the knowledge of implementation details
> when exercising the library so that tests don't start failing
> after a conforming optimization or some such tweak is added
> to the code.

That's right. I'll improve it.

Thanks for the review.


View raw message