Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-stdcxx-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-stdcxx-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A8D05D83D for ; Mon, 17 Sep 2012 15:45:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 41245 invoked by uid 500); 17 Sep 2012 15:45:05 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-stdcxx-dev-archive@stdcxx.apache.org Received: (qmail 41190 invoked by uid 500); 17 Sep 2012 15:45:05 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@stdcxx.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@stdcxx.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@stdcxx.apache.org Received: (qmail 41181 invoked by uid 99); 17 Sep 2012 15:45:04 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 17 Sep 2012 15:45:04 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of stefan.teleman@gmail.com designates 209.85.220.182 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.220.182] (HELO mail-vc0-f182.google.com) (209.85.220.182) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 17 Sep 2012 15:44:58 +0000 Received: by vcbfw7 with SMTP id fw7so7690541vcb.41 for ; Mon, 17 Sep 2012 08:44:37 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=oysXnjF2/wbwH8S33UyJFDA7jJuSGxxyukzL/AGsdpg=; b=hFxjqYBkoNNrULoeeQ83i87OgdPXamu8lR+a4HN7l6Fd8BdjQmUDls76n/W4sV5dF/ RCjcMEheEchviCrt6dcuS2vweGUpKxX2tGaVLkhVF3xl3Ve7zhNLMaE8ZyX8yvOkU5rn SQCqj7yE41PMiKQpTydjTyCkLwJ6wSvpXQfHuOB/q/PYAsqVfuatfWN5f2EnA08asH7l PqHlcuby3aDCZq8mQHIBdKWmLblGoMDeuvb7yg9csDZbmzVW80RdP5/98dzttbP3AhYf Vc+/n47d6v0MoZ84/nrz5XOmVe9PSa8cANDcLdTRmSFYy0DJEYFDSnslLY8GDCRHNE0x SM2A== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.52.34.162 with SMTP id a2mr1953434vdj.19.1347896677501; Mon, 17 Sep 2012 08:44:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.58.29.164 with HTTP; Mon, 17 Sep 2012 08:44:37 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <9ippq5k7j87.fsf@e103010-lin.cambridge.arm.com> References: <40394653-8FCC-4D04-A108-2C650AF8F95B@hates.ms> <504FE7F9.90102@gmail.com> <504FF10E.8020506@hates.ms> <50508849.4070708@hates.ms> <50547C22.1000604@hates.ms> <5054EAB7.5050609@hates.ms> <5055EE63.6090004@hates.ms> <50566461.4080101@hates.ms> <50571B8B.6020202@hates.ms> <50573F0F.3090908@hates.ms> <5057413C.3060207@hates.ms> <9ippq5k7j87.fsf@e103010-lin.cambridge.arm.com> Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2012 11:44:37 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: STDCXX-1056 [was: Re: STDCXX forks] From: Stefan Teleman To: dev@stdcxx.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 11:38 AM, Wojciech Meyer wrote: > so which compilers do fail? You know, some of them might use the same > component. Intel Compiler/Thread Analyzer on Linux, SunPro Compiler/Thread Analyzer on Linux and Solaris (Intel and SPARC). All three of them show the same exact problems. The Intel Compilers and the SunPro Compilers have nothing in common with each other. -- Stefan Teleman KDE e.V. stefan.teleman@gmail.com