Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-stdcxx-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-stdcxx-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 9A6E7DAA8 for ; Fri, 28 Sep 2012 12:48:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 25349 invoked by uid 500); 28 Sep 2012 12:48:57 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-stdcxx-dev-archive@stdcxx.apache.org Received: (qmail 25268 invoked by uid 500); 28 Sep 2012 12:48:56 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@stdcxx.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@stdcxx.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@stdcxx.apache.org Received: (qmail 25231 invoked by uid 99); 28 Sep 2012 12:48:55 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 28 Sep 2012 12:48:55 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [64.34.174.152] (HELO hates.ms) (64.34.174.152) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 28 Sep 2012 12:48:46 +0000 Received: from [192.168.72.105] (unknown [166.57.38.196]) by hates.ms (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 940A245C1AE for ; Fri, 28 Sep 2012 12:48:25 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <50659BD9.3040709@hates.ms> Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2012 08:45:13 -0400 From: Liviu Nicoara User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:15.0) Gecko/20120907 Thunderbird/15.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: dev@stdcxx.apache.org Subject: Re: STDCXX-1072 SPARC V8 mutex alignment requirements References: <50659828.9070409@hates.ms> In-Reply-To: <50659828.9070409@hates.ms> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 09/28/12 08:29, Liviu Nicoara wrote: > I have created the above and linked it to the closed STDCXX-1066. > [...] > IMO, the patch I attached does not break binary compatibility. Scratch this, I haven't thought it through. Thanks, Liviu