Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-stdcxx-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-stdcxx-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 6975F96EE for ; Tue, 11 Sep 2012 14:19:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 16223 invoked by uid 500); 11 Sep 2012 14:19:48 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-stdcxx-dev-archive@stdcxx.apache.org Received: (qmail 16190 invoked by uid 500); 11 Sep 2012 14:19:48 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@stdcxx.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@stdcxx.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@stdcxx.apache.org Received: (qmail 16179 invoked by uid 99); 11 Sep 2012 14:19:47 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 11 Sep 2012 14:19:47 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [64.34.174.152] (HELO hates.ms) (64.34.174.152) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 11 Sep 2012 14:19:40 +0000 Received: from [192.168.72.105] (unknown [166.57.38.196]) by hates.ms (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 10E7945C09A for ; Tue, 11 Sep 2012 14:19:18 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <504F48A5.7010101@hates.ms> Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2012 10:20:21 -0400 From: Liviu Nicoara User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686 on x86_64; rv:15.0) Gecko/20120824 Thunderbird/15.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: dev@stdcxx.apache.org Subject: Re: Board report time References: <666F5113-5ADA-4B6C-8DB4-8D7F9F0BB388@jaguNET.com> In-Reply-To: <666F5113-5ADA-4B6C-8DB4-8D7F9F0BB388@jaguNET.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On 09/11/12 08:15, Jim Jagielski wrote: > It's time for our report to the board... > > what would we like to share? > > I see: > > o renewed discussion on health/viability of pmc > o increased development being done > o PMC expressing interest in moving to git This sounds about right. It should also mention that some members expressed interest in alternative licensing. Thanks. Liviu