Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-stdcxx-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-stdcxx-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0645797EC for ; Thu, 20 Sep 2012 23:40:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 95431 invoked by uid 500); 20 Sep 2012 23:40:21 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-stdcxx-dev-archive@stdcxx.apache.org Received: (qmail 95395 invoked by uid 500); 20 Sep 2012 23:40:21 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@stdcxx.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@stdcxx.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@stdcxx.apache.org Received: (qmail 95387 invoked by uid 99); 20 Sep 2012 23:40:21 -0000 Received: from minotaur.apache.org (HELO minotaur.apache.org) (140.211.11.9) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 20 Sep 2012 23:40:21 +0000 Received: from localhost (HELO [192.168.1.200]) (127.0.0.1) (smtp-auth username lnicoara, mechanism plain) by minotaur.apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 20 Sep 2012 23:40:21 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1278) Subject: Re: STDCXX-1056 : numpunct fix From: Liviu Nicoara In-Reply-To: Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2012 19:40:19 -0400 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <387F8CB6-D039-4366-917A-441011E4AC4C@hates.ms> References: <505A6877.7090507@hates.ms> <346B7FD6-C961-4C0C-91C3-9FBBE442490D@hates.ms> <505B858A.8020801@hates.ms> <894FBDAF-8B56-4C7F-9FC0-B8DC37463354@hates.ms> To: dev@stdcxx.apache.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1278) On Sep 20, 2012, at 7:37 PM, Stefan Teleman wrote: > On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 7:34 PM, Wojciech Meyer > wrote: >> Hi, >>=20 >> My perceptions is by reading through the whole thread - we should not >> trust 100% external tools to asses the safety of the code. I don't = think >> there exist an algorithm that produces no false positives. >>=20 >> That's said I admire Stefan's approach, but we should ask the = question >> are we MT safe enough? I would say from what I read here: yes. >=20 > Based on what objective metric? The only gold currency that anyone in here accepts without reservations = are failing test cases. I believe I have seen some exceptions to the = golden rule in my RW time, but I can't recall any specific instance. Liviu=20