From dev-return-8720-apmail-stdcxx-dev-archive=stdcxx.apache.org@stdcxx.apache.org Mon Sep 17 15:27:55 2012 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-stdcxx-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-stdcxx-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id BB2D9D0D5 for ; Mon, 17 Sep 2012 15:27:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 93098 invoked by uid 500); 17 Sep 2012 15:27:55 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-stdcxx-dev-archive@stdcxx.apache.org Received: (qmail 93056 invoked by uid 500); 17 Sep 2012 15:27:55 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@stdcxx.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@stdcxx.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@stdcxx.apache.org Received: (qmail 93043 invoked by uid 99); 17 Sep 2012 15:27:55 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 17 Sep 2012 15:27:55 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [64.34.174.152] (HELO hates.ms) (64.34.174.152) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 17 Sep 2012 15:27:49 +0000 Received: from [192.168.72.105] (unknown [166.57.38.196]) by hates.ms (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A40CB45C1A9 for ; Mon, 17 Sep 2012 15:27:28 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <5057413C.3060207@hates.ms> Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2012 11:26:52 -0400 From: Liviu Nicoara User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686 on x86_64; rv:15.0) Gecko/20120824 Thunderbird/15.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: dev@stdcxx.apache.org Subject: Re: STDCXX-1056 [was: Re: STDCXX forks] References: <40394653-8FCC-4D04-A108-2C650AF8F95B@hates.ms> <504FE7F9.90102@gmail.com> <504FF10E.8020506@hates.ms> <50508849.4070708@hates.ms> <50547C22.1000604@hates.ms> <5054EAB7.5050609@hates.ms> <5055EE63.6090004@hates.ms> <50566461.4080101@hates.ms> <50571B8B.6020202@hates.ms> <50573F0F.3090908@hates.ms> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On 09/17/12 11:21, Stefan Teleman wrote: > On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 11:17 AM, Liviu Nicoara wrote: > >> I hope you agree that this synchronization is sufficient for the facet >> initialization and reading of facet data. > > Sorry, I do not agree. Two different thread analyzers from two > different compilers written by two different compiler writers tell me > not to. Stefan, that is indeed your prerogative. However, please keep in mind that tools may be buggy or may have limitations beyond what is advertised. I do not ask you to have faith in my analysis, which would be absurd, but to look for yourself, exercise due diligence in testing the code and draw your own conclusions. Thanks, Liviu