stdcxx-dev mailing list archives: September 2012

Site index · List index
Message list1 · 2 · 3 · Next »Thread · Author · Date
Jim Jagielski Re: New chair and/or attic Fri, 31 Aug, 18:28
Liviu Nicoara [PATCH] Trivial test fix Sat, 01 Sep, 14:49
Jim Jagielski Re: New committers? Sat, 01 Sep, 15:09
Jim Jagielski Re: New committers? Sat, 01 Sep, 15:11
Liviu Nicoara Re: STDCXX forks Sat, 01 Sep, 16:15
Stefan Teleman Re: [PATCH] Trivial test fix Sat, 01 Sep, 17:22
Liviu Nicoara Re: STDCXX forks Sat, 01 Sep, 17:44
Stefan Teleman Re: STDCXX forks Sat, 01 Sep, 17:52
Liviu Nicoara Re: STDCXX forks Sat, 01 Sep, 21:24
Martin Sebor Re: Branching policy, 4.3.x, 5.0.0, etc. Sun, 02 Sep, 03:38
Martin Sebor Re: New committers? Sun, 02 Sep, 04:02
Jim Jagielski Re: New committers? Sun, 02 Sep, 14:42
Wojciech Meyer Re: New committers? Sun, 02 Sep, 15:28
Wojciech Meyer Re: stdcxx issue 1058 Sun, 02 Sep, 16:05
Wojciech Meyer Re: STDCXX forks Sun, 02 Sep, 16:10
Wojciech Meyer stdcxx Wikipedia update Sun, 02 Sep, 16:16
Liviu Nicoara Re: stdcxx Wikipedia update Sun, 02 Sep, 16:21
Liviu Nicoara STDCXX-1056 [was: Re: STDCXX forks] Mon, 03 Sep, 19:19
Stefan Teleman Re: STDCXX-1056 [was: Re: STDCXX forks] Tue, 04 Sep, 03:57
Stefan Teleman Re: STDCXX-1056 [was: Re: STDCXX forks] Tue, 04 Sep, 04:25
Stefan Teleman Re: STDCXX-1056 [was: Re: STDCXX forks] Tue, 04 Sep, 09:37
Liviu Nicoara Re: STDCXX-1056 [was: Re: STDCXX forks] Tue, 04 Sep, 11:35
Stefan Teleman Re: STDCXX-1056 [was: Re: STDCXX forks] Tue, 04 Sep, 14:34
Martin Sebor Re: New committers? Tue, 04 Sep, 16:04
Martin Sebor Re: stdcxx Wikipedia update Tue, 04 Sep, 20:28
Liviu Nicoara Intel C++ bug reports? Wed, 05 Sep, 01:02
Liviu Nicoara Re: STDCXX-1056 [was: Re: STDCXX forks] Wed, 05 Sep, 01:15
"C. Bergström" Re: Intel C++ bug reports? Wed, 05 Sep, 01:19
Martin Sebor Re: Intel C++ bug reports? Wed, 05 Sep, 01:25
Stefan Teleman Re: STDCXX-1056 [was: Re: STDCXX forks] Wed, 05 Sep, 01:40
Martin Sebor Re: STDCXX-1056 [was: Re: STDCXX forks] Wed, 05 Sep, 02:49
Stefan Teleman Re: STDCXX-1056 [was: Re: STDCXX forks] Wed, 05 Sep, 04:51
Liviu Nicoara Re: Intel C++ bug reports? Wed, 05 Sep, 11:20
Liviu Nicoara Re: STDCXX-1056 [was: Re: STDCXX forks] Wed, 05 Sep, 12:47
Martin Sebor Re: STDCXX-1056 [was: Re: STDCXX forks] Wed, 05 Sep, 14:52
Travis Vitek RE: Intel C++ bug reports? Wed, 05 Sep, 15:15
Martin Sebor Re: Intel C++ bug reports? Wed, 05 Sep, 15:16
Liviu Nicoara Re: Intel C++ bug reports? Wed, 05 Sep, 18:05
Stefan Teleman Re: STDCXX-1056 [was: Re: STDCXX forks] Wed, 05 Sep, 18:09
Liviu Nicoara Re: STDCXX-1056 [was: Re: STDCXX forks] Wed, 05 Sep, 18:40
Martin Sebor Re: STDCXX-1056 [was: Re: STDCXX forks] Wed, 05 Sep, 19:17
Liviu Nicoara Re: STDCXX-1056 [was: Re: STDCXX forks] Wed, 05 Sep, 19:33
Martin Sebor Re: STDCXX-1056 [was: Re: STDCXX forks] Wed, 05 Sep, 20:03
Stefan Teleman Re: STDCXX-1056 [was: Re: STDCXX forks] Wed, 05 Sep, 20:20
Pavel Heimlich, a.k.a. hajma Re: STDCXX-1056 [was: Re: STDCXX forks] Wed, 05 Sep, 21:35
Stefan Teleman Re: STDCXX-1056 [was: Re: STDCXX forks] Thu, 06 Sep, 02:20
Martin Sebor Re: STDCXX-1056 [was: Re: STDCXX forks] Thu, 06 Sep, 02:55
Stefan Teleman Re: STDCXX-1056 [was: Re: STDCXX forks] Thu, 06 Sep, 03:03
Martin Sebor Re: STDCXX-1056 [was: Re: STDCXX forks] Thu, 06 Sep, 03:51
Martin Sebor Re: STDCXX-1056 [was: Re: STDCXX forks] Thu, 06 Sep, 04:17
Liviu Nicoara Re: STDCXX-1056 [was: Re: STDCXX forks] Thu, 06 Sep, 13:16
Jim Jagielski Re: New committers? Thu, 06 Sep, 13:22
Stefan Teleman Re: STDCXX-1056 [was: Re: STDCXX forks] Thu, 06 Sep, 15:58
Martin Sebor Re: STDCXX-1056 [was: Re: STDCXX forks] Thu, 06 Sep, 16:16
Martin Sebor Re: New committers? Thu, 06 Sep, 16:26
Liviu Nicoara A question (or two) of procedure, etc. Thu, 06 Sep, 18:06
Wojciech Meyer Re: A question (or two) of procedure, etc. Thu, 06 Sep, 18:37
Stefan Teleman Re: STDCXX-1056 [was: Re: STDCXX forks] Thu, 06 Sep, 18:46
Liviu Nicoara Re: A question (or two) of procedure, etc. Thu, 06 Sep, 18:57
Jim Jagielski Re: New committers? Thu, 06 Sep, 19:06
Jim Jagielski Re: A question (or two) of procedure, etc. Thu, 06 Sep, 19:08
Stefan Teleman Re: STDCXX-1056 [was: Re: STDCXX forks] Thu, 06 Sep, 19:47
Martin Sebor Re: STDCXX-1056 [was: Re: STDCXX forks] Thu, 06 Sep, 20:02
Stefan Teleman Re: STDCXX-1056 [was: Re: STDCXX forks] Thu, 06 Sep, 22:43
Liviu Nicoara Re: STDCXX-1056 [was: Re: STDCXX forks] Thu, 06 Sep, 23:31
Martin Sebor Re: STDCXX-1056 [was: Re: STDCXX forks] Thu, 06 Sep, 23:54
Martin Sebor Re: A question (or two) of procedure, etc. Fri, 07 Sep, 02:36
Martin Sebor Re: A question (or two) of procedure, etc. Fri, 07 Sep, 02:52
Stefan Teleman Re: STDCXX-1056 [was: Re: STDCXX forks] Fri, 07 Sep, 02:58
Martin Sebor Re: A question (or two) of procedure, etc. Fri, 07 Sep, 03:00
Wojciech Meyer Re: A question (or two) of procedure, etc. Fri, 07 Sep, 03:29
Wojciech Meyer Re: A question (or two) of procedure, etc. Fri, 07 Sep, 03:57
Jim Jagielski Re: A question (or two) of procedure, etc. Fri, 07 Sep, 11:26
Jim Jagielski Re: A question (or two) of procedure, etc. Fri, 07 Sep, 11:27
Liviu Nicoara Re: STDCXX-1056 [was: Re: STDCXX forks] Fri, 07 Sep, 11:37
Liviu Nicoara Re: A question (or two) of procedure, etc. Fri, 07 Sep, 11:40
Liviu Nicoara Re: STDCXX-1056 [was: Re: STDCXX forks] Fri, 07 Sep, 11:58
Jim Jagielski Re: A question (or two) of procedure, etc. Fri, 07 Sep, 12:15
Liviu Nicoara Re: STDCXX-1056 [was: Re: STDCXX forks] Fri, 07 Sep, 12:52
Martin Sebor Re: A question (or two) of procedure, etc. Fri, 07 Sep, 14:54
Liviu Nicoara Re: A question (or two) of procedure, etc. Fri, 07 Sep, 15:20
Stefan Teleman Re: STDCXX-1056 [was: Re: STDCXX forks] Fri, 07 Sep, 15:58
Liviu Nicoara dbx [was: Re: STDCXX-1056 [was: Re: STDCXX forks]] Fri, 07 Sep, 16:23
Stefan Teleman Re: dbx [was: Re: STDCXX-1056 [was: Re: STDCXX forks]] Fri, 07 Sep, 18:01
Liviu Nicoara [PATCH] STDCXX-1067 Mac builds Sun, 09 Sep, 21:16
Wojciech Meyer Re: [PATCH] STDCXX-1067 Mac builds Sun, 09 Sep, 23:07
Liviu Nicoara Re: [PATCH] STDCXX-1067 Mac builds Sun, 09 Sep, 23:21
Stefan Teleman Re: STDCXX-1056 [was: Re: STDCXX forks] Mon, 10 Sep, 16:56
Martin Sebor Re: STDCXX-1056 [was: Re: STDCXX forks] Mon, 10 Sep, 17:32
Liviu Nicoara Re: STDCXX-1056 [was: Re: STDCXX forks] Mon, 10 Sep, 18:21
Stefan Teleman Re: STDCXX-1056 [was: Re: STDCXX forks] Mon, 10 Sep, 19:01
Liviu Nicoara Re: STDCXX-1056 [was: Re: STDCXX forks] Mon, 10 Sep, 19:08
Stefan Teleman Re: STDCXX-1056 [was: Re: STDCXX forks] Mon, 10 Sep, 20:24
Jim Jagielski Board report time Tue, 11 Sep, 12:15
Liviu Nicoara Re: Board report time Tue, 11 Sep, 14:20
Stefan Teleman Re: STDCXX-1056 [was: Re: STDCXX forks] Tue, 11 Sep, 22:15
Martin Sebor Re: STDCXX-1056 [was: Re: STDCXX forks] Wed, 12 Sep, 01:40
Liviu Nicoara Re: STDCXX-1056 [was: Re: STDCXX forks] Wed, 12 Sep, 02:18
Stefan Teleman Re: STDCXX-1056 [was: Re: STDCXX forks] Wed, 12 Sep, 04:21
Jim Jagielski [REPORT] Apache C++ Standard Library (stdcxx) Wed, 12 Sep, 10:39
Message list1 · 2 · 3 · Next »Thread · Author · Date
Box list
Oct 20132
Aug 20133
Jul 20132
Jun 20134
May 201320
Apr 201314
Oct 201245
Sep 2012267
Aug 201275
Jun 20123
May 201214
Mar 20121
Feb 201230
Dec 20115
Jun 201112
Mar 20115
Feb 20113
Jan 20111
Sep 20109
Aug 20103
Jul 20104
Jun 201012
May 20104
Oct 20091
Sep 20094
Aug 200912
Jul 20091
Jun 20097
May 200910
Feb 20092
Jan 20093
Dec 20087
Nov 200813
Oct 200829
Sep 200826
Aug 200815
Jul 2008190
Jun 2008350
May 2008189
Apr 2008342
Mar 2008193
Feb 2008114
Jan 2008276
Dec 2007275
Nov 2007420
Oct 2007632
Sep 2007536
Aug 2007616
Jul 2007286
Jun 2007255
May 2007338
Apr 2007145
Mar 2007416
Feb 2007109
Jan 200791
Dec 200681
Nov 200695
Oct 200693
Sep 2006145
Aug 2006224
Jul 2006182
Jun 2006245
May 2006171
Apr 200680
Mar 2006155
Feb 2006198
Jan 2006294
Dec 2005165
Nov 200556
Oct 200554
Sep 2005137
Aug 200575
Jul 200529