stdcxx-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Wojciech Meyer <wojciech.me...@googlemail.com>
Subject Re: STDCXX-1070
Date Thu, 27 Sep 2012 01:05:02 GMT
Martin Sebor <msebor@gmail.com> writes:

>> Clear to go ahead here?
>
> You mean apply the patch attached to STDCXX-1070? It looks good
> to me. I also checked the test. It's odd that the problem didn't
> get caught sooner (we did get errors when the function templates
> were declared static, which is why the static keyword is commented
> out). But it sure does look like a problem.
>
> FWIW, if you want quick input on a patch, I find it easier when
> it's posted to the list (instead of attaching it to the issue).
> Attaching it is useful when it's large and/or when you don't
> have commit permissions. Others may have a different preference.

My personal preference would be both.

>
> Martin
>
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Liviu
>>
>

Thanks,

--
Wojciech Meyer
http://danmey.org

Mime
View raw message