stdcxx-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Stefan Teleman <>
Subject Re: STDCXX-1056 [was: Re: STDCXX forks]
Date Mon, 10 Sep 2012 20:24:30 GMT
On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 1:32 PM, Martin Sebor <> wrote:

> That said, I'd certainly prefer to avoid hacks as much as
> possible. This problem could perhaps more cleanly be solved
> by having the facet pass a reference to the string (or to
> all of its internal data) to modify to the function (or
> something like that). Unfortunately, it would break binary
> compatibility.

I think I have something which doesn't break BC - stay tuned because
I'm testing it now.


Stefan Teleman
KDE e.V.

View raw message