stdcxx-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Stefan Teleman <stefan.tele...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: STDCXX-1066 [was: Re: STDCXX forks]
Date Mon, 24 Sep 2012 04:09:47 GMT
On Sun, Sep 23, 2012 at 7:25 PM, Liviu Nicoara <nikkoara@hates.ms> wrote:

> I am not asking for any other implementation and I am not looking to change
> anything. I wish you could explain it to us, but in the absence of trade
> secret details I will take an explanation for the questions above.

Sorry, no.

This will not be another replay of the stdcxx-1056 email discussion,
which was a three week waste of my time.

The patch is provided "AS IS". No further testing and no further
comments. I do have more important things to do.

-- 
Stefan Teleman
KDE e.V.
stefan.teleman@gmail.com

Mime
View raw message