stdcxx-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Wojciech Meyer <wojciech.me...@arm.com>
Subject Re: STDCXX-1056 [was: Re: STDCXX forks]
Date Mon, 17 Sep 2012 15:38:16 GMT
Liviu Nicoara <nikkoara@hates.ms> writes:

> On 09/17/12 11:21, Stefan Teleman wrote:
>> On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 11:17 AM, Liviu Nicoara <nikkoara@hates.ms> wrote:
>>
>>> I hope you agree that this synchronization is sufficient for the facet
>>> initialization and reading of facet data.
>>
>> Sorry, I do not agree. Two different thread analyzers from two
>> different compilers written by two different compiler writers tell me
>> not to.
>
> Stefan, that is indeed your prerogative. However, please keep in mind
> that tools may be buggy or may have limitations beyond what is
> advertised. I do not ask you to have faith in my analysis, which would
> be absurd, but to look for yourself, exercise due diligence in testing
> the code and draw your own conclusions.

so which compilers do fail? You know, some of them might use the same
component.

-- 
Wojciech


Mime
View raw message