From dev-return-8573-apmail-stdcxx-dev-archive=stdcxx.apache.org@stdcxx.apache.org Fri Aug 31 18:44:08 2012 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-stdcxx-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-stdcxx-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id AB8AEADB for ; Fri, 31 Aug 2012 18:44:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 86794 invoked by uid 500); 31 Aug 2012 18:44:08 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-stdcxx-dev-archive@stdcxx.apache.org Received: (qmail 86757 invoked by uid 500); 31 Aug 2012 18:44:08 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@stdcxx.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@stdcxx.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@stdcxx.apache.org Received: (qmail 86749 invoked by uid 99); 31 Aug 2012 18:44:08 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 31 Aug 2012 18:44:08 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: 76.96.62.32 is neither permitted nor denied by domain of jim@jagunet.com) Received: from [76.96.62.32] (HELO qmta03.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net) (76.96.62.32) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 31 Aug 2012 18:44:01 +0000 Received: from omta13.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.62.52]) by qmta03.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net with comcast id tMfk1j00C17dt5G53Wjk1o; Fri, 31 Aug 2012 18:43:44 +0000 Received: from [192.168.199.10] ([69.251.80.74]) by omta13.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net with comcast id tWkB1j00U1cCKD93ZWkC5Z; Fri, 31 Aug 2012 18:44:12 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.0 \(1486\)) Subject: Re: New committers? From: Jim Jagielski In-Reply-To: <504104BE.3020106@pathscale.com> Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2012 14:43:39 -0400 Cc: Stefan Teleman Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <9F93762F-E448-43B3-A8F2-062E519DB218@jaguNET.com> References: <503F6E0B.2080009@hates.ms> <503F8EF0.7070907@gmail.com> <9ipfw7389fq.fsf@e103010-lin.cambridge.arm.com> <5041001F.5030502@pathscale.com> <4E4CA039-F04D-43FC-908F-D87E98E6071F@jaguNET.com> <50410226.5090805@pathscale.com> <504104BE.3020106@pathscale.com> To: dev@stdcxx.apache.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1486) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On Aug 31, 2012, at 2:38 PM, "C. Bergstr=F6m" = wrote: > On 09/ 1/12 01:35 AM, Stefan Teleman wrote: >> On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 2:27 PM, "C. Bergstr=F6m" >> wrote: >>=20 >>> stdcxx ends up linking against *EVERY* C++ application if it's used = in the >>> default compiler setup. (Which is what I was trying to achieve) = That >>> includes *******GPLv2******** software in ports. Get it? >> How exactly is APLv2 different from 2-clause BSD or 3-clause BSD in >> this respect? The BSD licenses are just as incompatible with GPLv2 as >> APLv2 is. > Our views may be the same, but others are not >=20 > from the apache website >=20 > "Despite our best efforts, the FSF has never considered the Apache = License to be compatible with GPL version 2" > http://www.apache.org/licenses/GPL-compatibility.html >=20 FWIW, however, the ASF does not agree with that. That is pretty common knowledge. So your view agrees with that of the ASF.=