stdcxx-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Jim Jagielski <>
Subject Re: New committers?
Date Fri, 31 Aug 2012 12:07:40 GMT
As I see it, these 2/3 people were added before I was assigned
as chair. I also don't see that, at least according to ldap,
that they have commit privs. Nor, as stated, were they
added to committee-info.txt. And in March 2012's report
( we

Last month, stdcxx added three committers/PMC members. One sent in his
CLA and and an account for him was created. The other two are in the
process of getting their CLAs signed by their employers.

So how are/were they committers??

On Aug 30, 2012, at 12:04 PM, Martin Sebor <> wrote:

> On 08/30/2012 09:17 AM, Stefan Teleman wrote:
>> On Thu, Aug 30, 2012 at 9:43 AM, Liviu Nicoara<>  wrote:
>>> I see in the February report (
>>> that three new committers have been added to the project. Congratulations!
>>> Could one of you please update the stdcxx list of committers?
>> I don't mean to punt but I think Jim Jagielski maintains a separate
>> link with the correct list of committers:
>> <QUOTE>
>> An up-to-date list of all Apache committers (or committers-to-be) is
>> being maintained by Jim Jagielski on this page.
>> </QUOTE>
>> which links to:
>> But out of that comprehensive list of all the ASF Committers, I don't
>> know who the other two stdcxx Committers are.
> Christopher Bergström, and Wojciech Meyer.
>> Which also begs the question: why was this stdcxx Committers list
>> update done this way, by linking to a separate page, when the change
>> could have very well be made directly to the stdcxx's Committers list.
> I would usually update the Committers table when I chaired
> the project. But any committer can update the STDCXX site.
> It doesn't have to be the chair. It would be useful to have
> instructions for how to do it somewhere. Let me see if I can
> find some time to write them up and post them.
> FWIW, the link to Jim's page is there simply as a reference
> to the (at one point and maybe still) authoritative list of
> all committers and committers-to-be. I thought it would be
> handy when we forgot to update the table.
> Martin
>> --Stefan

View raw message