stdcxx-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Jim Jagielski <...@jaguNET.com>
Subject Re: New committers?
Date Fri, 31 Aug 2012 18:13:23 GMT

On Aug 31, 2012, at 9:42 AM, Wojciech Meyer <wojciech.meyer@arm.com> wrote:

> Jim Jagielski <jim@jaguNET.com> writes:
> 
>> So how are/were they committers??
> 
> Hi!
> 
> Chime in - I think we need to clarify what kind of problems we have with
> stdcxx being hosted as an Apache project.
> 
> The two significant ones (as far as I can understand):
> 
> - as I heard from Christopher Bergström that it's hard to push the
>  stdcxx to FreeBSD ports repository (I can understand it and that
>  sounds pretty bad, if that's the case then the board should consider
>  re-licensing as advised; I agree in general it's a hard decision for
>  the board, but imagine the project would benefit, IANAL tho)

Not exactly sure why, or how, since there are other ASF projects
in the FreeBSD ports directory... LOTS of others.

> 
> So what we need to submit from everybody (not trying to be bossy this
> time :-))
> 1) list of *real* impediments, concrete examples: so we can workout the
> plan. Bullet points would be great, similar to facts table Christopher
> has submitted.
> 2) list of our commitments vs. stdcxx: who is going to do what in the
> meantime.
> 
> #1: Nothing comes to my mind right now, apart from not putting into
> attic for time being please, but I understand other people might have a
> lot of to say.
> 
> #2: I plan to commit my patches to armcc port of stdcxx in the short
> time, and perhaps help with the Clang port as somebody already have
> mentioned, this certainly needs to be discussed!

++1 !! Thx!!!


Mime
View raw message