Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-stdcxx-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-stdcxx-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 26D1F6B47 for ; Sun, 26 Jun 2011 18:17:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 18966 invoked by uid 500); 26 Jun 2011 18:17:43 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-stdcxx-dev-archive@stdcxx.apache.org Received: (qmail 18828 invoked by uid 500); 26 Jun 2011 18:17:42 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@stdcxx.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@stdcxx.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@stdcxx.apache.org Received: (qmail 18812 invoked by uid 99); 26 Jun 2011 18:17:42 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 26 Jun 2011 18:17:42 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of stefan.teleman@gmail.com designates 209.85.214.54 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.214.54] (HELO mail-bw0-f54.google.com) (209.85.214.54) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 26 Jun 2011 18:17:37 +0000 Received: by bwa20 with SMTP id 20so1205550bwa.41 for ; Sun, 26 Jun 2011 11:17:16 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=c54MmMTRWNCPJ3tzKFuArksnTiOF9BU9PgRISsv74Ck=; b=XTeBvZEOePnbNEpTVofrFEYl1SROG+gzZ+7g5epvWZFp0529LInnLIHazoxpJZk5NF i0sNtxXcIxBwSC/uzqoGVq9IXW55KBCy4XG0MImnZXjni2oC80kKPSbzDqaDq6waXubz e4Czsxjow8H+UgDwv4hbA701VdeePsWR+HA8c= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=C5BGULcz3cIkmdJ0CJ+dqBQQZyANN5jO8hMJ4njJTKwTN0pQfM7oZEO4jvzhKGxuGU KB5jgY5N/T5JHHJpEAoG+wvR4DG5MRQiOZE01uiWGlpT4uxhbkOJjEHD8uV9BSszD9pH hvgc5FcpD5MeUAtsASsCvThvrrH8T4RSukRVw= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.20.143 with SMTP id f15mr3570731bkb.173.1309112235775; Sun, 26 Jun 2011 11:17:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.204.78.137 with HTTP; Sun, 26 Jun 2011 11:17:15 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4E076B9F.4010801@pathscale.com> References: <4DFAE25E.9040703@pathscale.com> <4DFB7400.9080904@pathscale.com> <4E06B97C.10804@pathscale.com> <4E06CF4C.5080709@pathscale.com> <4E076B9F.4010801@pathscale.com> Date: Sun, 26 Jun 2011 14:17:15 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: STDCXX "fork" From: Stefan Teleman To: dev@stdcxx.apache.org, "stdcxx-dev@apache.org" Cc: =?UTF-8?Q?C=2E_Bergstr=C3=B6m?= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable 2011/6/26 "C. Bergstr=C3=B6m" : > PathScale has a Perennial license and feel free to privately email which > issues the patches specifically fix. Great, then PathScale can run the Perennial C++ validation tests on PathScale's recently published stdcxx fork. I looked at the github code published by PathScale and it is obvious to me that it has not been validated against *any* C++2003 validation test harness. --Stefan --=20 Stefan Teleman KDE e.V. stefan.teleman@gmail.com