From dev-return-8445-apmail-stdcxx-dev-archive=stdcxx.apache.org@stdcxx.apache.org Sun Jun 26 06:14:56 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-stdcxx-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-stdcxx-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 2681C6EE3 for ; Sun, 26 Jun 2011 06:14:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 22578 invoked by uid 500); 26 Jun 2011 06:14:55 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-stdcxx-dev-archive@stdcxx.apache.org Received: (qmail 22446 invoked by uid 500); 26 Jun 2011 06:14:53 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@stdcxx.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@stdcxx.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@stdcxx.apache.org Received: (qmail 22425 invoked by uid 99); 26 Jun 2011 06:14:38 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 26 Jun 2011 06:14:38 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of cbergstrom@pathscale.com designates 209.85.160.54 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.160.54] (HELO mail-pw0-f54.google.com) (209.85.160.54) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 26 Jun 2011 06:14:30 +0000 Received: by pwi7 with SMTP id 7so3205451pwi.41 for ; Sat, 25 Jun 2011 23:14:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.68.47.130 with SMTP id d2mr2366255pbn.511.1309068850203; Sat, 25 Jun 2011 23:14:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.1.33] (ppp-58-8-61-159.revip2.asianet.co.th [58.8.61.159]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id n8sm3349039pbh.41.2011.06.25.23.14.08 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Sat, 25 Jun 2011 23:14:09 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4E06CF4C.5080709@pathscale.com> Date: Sun, 26 Jun 2011 13:18:52 +0700 From: =?UTF-8?B?IkMuIEJlcmdzdHLDtm0i?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; SunOS i86pc; en-US; rv:1.9.2.7) Gecko/20101031 Lightning/1.0b2 Thunderbird/3.1.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Stefan Teleman CC: dev@stdcxx.apache.org, "stdcxx-dev@apache.org" Subject: Re: STDCXX "fork" References: <4DFAE25E.9040703@pathscale.com> <4DFB7400.9080904@pathscale.com> <4E06B97C.10804@pathscale.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit On 06/26/11 11:55 AM, Stefan Teleman wrote: > 2011/6/26 "C. Bergström": > >> The last time we checked the patches they caused some boost regressions so please make sure to run the boost test suite. > We don't run the Boost tests to validate the 2003 C++ Standard. We run > the 2003 C++ Standard validation tests. If strict conformance to the > 2003 C++ Standard causes problems with Boost, then that's a Boost > problem and not a stdcxx problem. > > There were indeed numerous deviations from the 2003 C++ Standard in > the original stdcxx implementation. Do any of your patches fix these and if so which one(s)? Do you have reduced test cases or which test suite?