Mailing-List: contact dev-help@stdcxx.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@stdcxx.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of msebor@gmail.com designates
 209.85.198.238 as permitted sender)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=message-id:date:from:organization:user-agent:mime-version:to
         :subject:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:sender;
        b=jvnuIWdS0nej1eLWb7bTn5GX5MzTfcU/S5wFoMONbJQbrY25SPdFiTcwhefh+EKjUy
         jX369bRxmEYQubBPKOMRskxuDwk0gP8dFfWImmyhIDMVbTJPIe/GRJW5cvKxOq9IQoZc
         j2syUNcaTCyPkPrlXXA1ValMzWasCft9ZEfBA=
Message-ID: <48C7D644.3080203@roguewave.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2008 08:14:28 -0600
From: Martin Sebor <sebor@roguewave.com>
Organization: Rogue Wave Software, Inc.
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.16 (X11/20080723)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: dev@stdcxx.apache.org
Subject: Re: svn commit: r693424 -
 /stdcxx/branches/4.2.x/tests/regress/18.c.limits.stdcxx-988.cpp
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: Martin Sebor <msebor@gmail.com>

faridz wrote:
> 
> Author: faridz
> Date: Tue Sep  9 03:35:59 2008
> New Revision: 693424
> 
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=693424&view=rev
> Log:
> 2008-09-09  Farid Zaripov  <faridz@apache.org>
> 
> 	* tests/regress/18.c.limits.stdcxx-988.cpp: Resolved compilation
> 	error on MSVC and ICC/Windows.
> 
> Modified:
>     stdcxx/branches/4.2.x/tests/regress/18.c.limits.stdcxx-988.cpp
> 
> Modified: stdcxx/branches/4.2.x/tests/regress/18.c.limits.stdcxx-988.cpp
> URL:
> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/stdcxx/branches/4.2.x/tests/regress/18.c.limits.stdcxx-988.cpp?rev=693424&r1=693423&r2=693424&view=diff
> ==============================================================================
> --- stdcxx/branches/4.2.x/tests/regress/18.c.limits.stdcxx-988.cpp
> (original)
> +++ stdcxx/branches/4.2.x/tests/regress/18.c.limits.stdcxx-988.cpp Tue Sep 
> 9 03:35:59 2008
> @@ -138,14 +138,14 @@
>      assert (SCHAR_MAX  == +127);
>      assert (SHRT_MAX   >= +32767);
>  
> -#ifndef _RWSTD_EDG_ECCP
> +#if !defined (_RWSTD_EDG_ECCP) && !defined (_MSC_VER)
> 
> 

_RWSTD_EDG_ECCP should only be #defined when we're using the EDG eccp
vanilla demo, but not when we're using a compiler that sits on top of
the EDG front end such as Intel C++. If this condition evaluates to
true we have a configuration problem...

Martin

>  
>      // avoid exercising with the EDG eccp front end (strict mode)
>      assert (LONG_BIT   >= 32);
>      assert (SSIZE_MAX  >= _POSIX_SSIZE_MAX);
>      assert (WORD_BIT   >= 32);
>  
> -#endif   // EDG eccp
> +#endif   // EDG eccp || MSVC || ICC/Windows
>  
>      assert (UCHAR_MAX  >= 255);
>      assert (UINT_MAX   >= 4294967295);
> 
> 
> 
>