> -----Original Message-----
> From: Eric Lemings
> Sent: Wednesday, July 09, 2008 3:14 PM
> To: 'dev@stdcxx.apache.org'
> Subject: RE: svn commit: r675044 - in /stdcxx/branches/4.3.x:
> include/rw/_tuple.h include/tuple
> tests/utilities/20.tuple.cnstr.cpp
> tests/utilities/20.tuple.creation.cpp
> tests/utilities/20.tuple.h tests/utilities/20.tuple.helpers.cpp
>
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Martin Sebor [mailto:sebor@roguewave.com]
> > Sent: Wednesday, July 09, 2008 11:10 AM
> > To: dev@stdcxx.apache.org
> > Subject: Re: svn commit: r675044 - in /stdcxx/branches/4.3.x:
> > include/rw/_tuple.h include/tuple
> > tests/utilities/20.tuple.cnstr.cpp
> > tests/utilities/20.tuple.creation.cpp
> > tests/utilities/20.tuple.h tests/utilities/20.tuple.helpers.cpp
> >
> ...
> > > This can probably be changed to use a void return type, which will
> > > simplify the code further. You only really need the return
> > type to chain
> > > assignments or to call a function on the result, none of
> > which we should
> > > be doing.
> >
> > Good idea! Also, the inline specifier is redundant and should
> > be removed.
>
> A void return type causes an compile error:
Duh. Disregard.
|