stdcxx-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Eric Lemings" <Eric.Lemi...@roguewave.com>
Subject RE: svn commit: r672395 - in /stdcxx/branches/4.3.x/include: functional rw/_ref_wrap.h
Date Wed, 02 Jul 2008 21:41:32 GMT
 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Martin Sebor [mailto:msebor@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Martin Sebor
> Sent: Saturday, June 28, 2008 2:51 PM
> To: dev@stdcxx.apache.org
> Subject: Re: svn commit: r672395 - in 
> /stdcxx/branches/4.3.x/include: functional rw/_ref_wrap.h
> 
...
> 
>    5. The definitions of even trivial non-empty functions should
>       never appear on the same line as the function signature. I.e.,
>       the above should be:
> 
>       type& get() const {
>           _RWSTD_ASSERT (0 != _C_ptr);
>           return *_C_ptr;
>       }

I assume empty function definitions are exempted from this convention?

Brad.

Mime
View raw message