Eric Lemings wrote:
>
> I did debug and optimize builds on RH5, Sol10, and HP-UX 11.31 and they
> all built fine (unless I overlooked something).
>
> Will double-check.
I accidentally committed a fix for the problem last night:
http://tinyurl.com/597fug
I tested it with gcc but I haven't checked nightly results
yet, so if you could do that I'd appreciate it.
Martin
>
> Brad.
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Martin Sebor [mailto:msebor@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Martin Sebor
>> Sent: Wednesday, July 09, 2008 9:35 PM
>> To: dev@stdcxx.apache.org
>> Subject: Re: svn commit: r675315 -
>> /stdcxx/branches/4.2.x/tests/utilities/20.operators.cpp
>>
>> elemings@apache.org wrote:
>>> Author: elemings
>>> Date: Wed Jul 9 12:16:56 2008
>>> New Revision: 675315
>>>
>>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=675315&view=rev
>>> Log:
>>> 2008-07-09 Eric Lemings <eric.lemings@roguewave.com>
>>>
>>> STDCXX-550
>>> * tests/utilities/20.operators.cpp
>> (test_random_access_iterator):
>>> Oops. Should be `!defined' in #if directive.
>>>
>>>
>>> Modified:
>>> stdcxx/branches/4.2.x/tests/utilities/20.operators.cpp
>>>
>>> Modified: stdcxx/branches/4.2.x/tests/utilities/20.operators.cpp
>>> URL:
>> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/stdcxx/branches/4.2.x/tests/utili
>> ties/20.operators.cpp?rev=675315&r1=675314&r2=675315&view=diff
>> ==============================================================
>> ================
>>> --- stdcxx/branches/4.2.x/tests/utilities/20.operators.cpp
>> (original)
>>> +++ stdcxx/branches/4.2.x/tests/utilities/20.operators.cpp
>> Wed Jul 9 12:16:56 2008
>>> @@ -397,7 +397,7 @@
>>>
>>> typedef RandomAccessIterator I;
>>>
>>> -#if defined _RWSTD_NO_DEBUG_ITER
>>> +#if !defined _RWSTD_NO_DEBUG_ITER
>>> RandomNumberGenerator<typename I::difference_type> rndgen;
>> This won't compile when RandomAccessIterator is a plain pointer,
>> which both string::iterator and vector::iterator happen to be
>> when _RWSTD_NO_DEBUG_ITER is #defined (i.e., with optimization).
>>
>> Martin
>>
>>
|