Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-stdcxx-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 91941 invoked from network); 26 Jun 2008 20:55:55 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 26 Jun 2008 20:55:55 -0000 Received: (qmail 65503 invoked by uid 500); 26 Jun 2008 20:55:56 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-stdcxx-dev-archive@stdcxx.apache.org Received: (qmail 65442 invoked by uid 500); 26 Jun 2008 20:55:56 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@stdcxx.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@stdcxx.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@stdcxx.apache.org Received: (qmail 65431 invoked by uid 99); 26 Jun 2008 20:55:56 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 26 Jun 2008 13:55:56 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [208.30.140.160] (HELO moroha.roguewave.com) (208.30.140.160) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 26 Jun 2008 20:55:07 +0000 Received: from exchmail01.Blue.Roguewave.Com (exchmail01.blue.roguewave.com [10.22.129.22]) by moroha.roguewave.com (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id m5QKtPTT031970 for ; Thu, 26 Jun 2008 20:55:25 GMT X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5 Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: RE: 22.locale.codecvt.out test failure Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2008 14:54:50 -0600 Message-ID: X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: 22.locale.codecvt.out test failure Thread-Index: AcjXw9sLnH/9tmodTXuSFEs/0B1QOAACpVNQ References: <4863E22F.3010204@roguewave.com> <4863EEBA.6020901@roguewave.com> From: "Travis Vitek" To: X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org =20 >Martin Sebor wrote: >Travis Vitek wrote: >> Martin Sebor wrote: >>=20 >>> If this is true, we might want to change >>> the exec utility (which does the redirection) to send the output of >>> tests somewhere else. >>> >>=20 >> Sure, that is one option. But that doesn't answer my question. Why is >> this failing now, after it worked in the past. See >>=20 >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STDCXX-650 > >Dunno. Maybe it never did work correctly and I missed it when >closing the issue. I'm absolutely certain it worked in the recent past, but I'll go back and do a build to make sure I'm not totally insane.