Return-Path: 
 <dev-return-7974-apmail-stdcxx-dev-archive=stdcxx.apache.org@stdcxx.apache.org>
Delivered-To: apmail-stdcxx-dev-archive@www.apache.org
Received: (qmail 44091 invoked from network); 25 Jun 2008 20:13:05 -0000
Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2)
  by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 25 Jun 2008 20:13:05 -0000
Received: (qmail 26699 invoked by uid 500); 25 Jun 2008 20:13:07 -0000
Delivered-To: apmail-stdcxx-dev-archive@stdcxx.apache.org
Received: (qmail 26683 invoked by uid 500); 25 Jun 2008 20:13:07 -0000
Mailing-List: contact dev-help@stdcxx.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:dev-help@stdcxx.apache.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:dev-unsubscribe@stdcxx.apache.org>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@stdcxx.apache.org>
List-Id: <dev.stdcxx.apache.org>
Reply-To: dev@stdcxx.apache.org
Delivered-To: mailing list dev@stdcxx.apache.org
Received: (qmail 26671 invoked by uid 99); 25 Jun 2008 20:13:07 -0000
Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 25 Jun 2008 13:13:06 -0700
X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0
	tests=SPF_PASS
X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: local policy)
Received: from [208.30.140.160] (HELO moroha.roguewave.com) (208.30.140.160)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 25 Jun 2008 20:12:14 +0000
Received: from exchmail01.Blue.Roguewave.Com (exchmail01.blue.roguewave.com
 [10.22.129.22])
	by moroha.roguewave.com (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id m5PKAWNd018192
	for <dev@stdcxx.apache.org>; Wed, 25 Jun 2008 20:10:32 GMT
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Subject: RE: svn commit: r669723 - in /stdcxx/branches/4.3.x:
 include/rw/_meta_cv.h include/rw/_tuple.h include/tuple
 tests/utilities/20.tuple.elem.cpp
Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2008 14:09:57 -0600
Message-ID: 
 <CFFDD219128FD94FB4F92B99F52D0A4901E0FBF1@exchmail01.Blue.Roguewave.Com>
X-MS-Has-Attach: 
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: 
Thread-Topic: svn commit: r669723 - in /stdcxx/branches/4.3.x:
 include/rw/_meta_cv.h include/rw/_tuple.h include/tuple
 tests/utilities/20.tuple.elem.cpp
Thread-Index: AcjSWU6WptZGgd6XTOuKZmF0+WEysAEpWkaQ
References: <20080619220914.09CE223889C2@eris.apache.org>
From: "Travis Vitek" <Travis.Vitek@roguewave.com>
To: <dev@stdcxx.apache.org>
X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org

=20

>
>Author: elemings
>Date: Thu Jun 19 15:09:13 2008
>New Revision: 669723
>
>URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=3D669723&view=3Drev
>Log:
>2008-06-19  Eric Lemings <eric.lemings@roguewave.com>
>
>	STDCXX-958

[...]

>+template <int _Index, class _Head, class... _Tail>
>+_TYPENAME tuple_element<_Index, tuple<_Head, _Tail...> >::_Ref
>+get (tuple<_Head, _Tail...>& __tuple)
>+{
>+    typedef tuple_element<_Index, tuple<_Head, _Tail...> > _Tuple;
>+    return _Tuple::__get (__tuple);
>+}
>+
>+template <int _Index, class _Head, class... _Tail>
>+_TYPENAME tuple_element<_Index, tuple<_Head, _Tail...> >::_ConstRef
>+get (const tuple<_Head, _Tail...>& __tuple)
>+{
>+    typedef tuple_element<_Index, tuple<_Head, _Tail...> > _Tuple;
>+    return _Tuple::__get (__tuple);
>+}

I just noticed LWG775. We should probably consider adopting the proposed
reslution.

  http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#775

Travis