Mailing-List: contact dev-help@stdcxx.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@stdcxx.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of msebor@gmail.com designates
 64.233.184.235 as permitted sender)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=message-id:date:from:organization:user-agent:mime-version:to
         :subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type
         :content-transfer-encoding:sender;
        b=Cd1sOS0ryL8HvlWE4ATALGCH5WGuqNOaYZO6CbZgsnB+0xhiPUSbm7+epyICjFhHV1
         E1quJe7jSuxbmBvY8Sc945lraKit6NYctNEqMBap1ZBwglixhwYKtaZMeyliGQxQbYJJ
         NRmWYiHPFdDm2wBJxX36f3Qxg1WNEVxrNcCsA=
Message-ID: <485EDF04.2090305@roguewave.com>
Date: Sun, 22 Jun 2008 17:23:48 -0600
From: Martin Sebor <sebor@roguewave.com>
Organization: Rogue Wave Software, Inc.
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.14 (X11/20080501)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: dev@stdcxx.apache.org
Subject: Re: need help in building apache standard library
References: <809254.81007.qm@web56809.mail.re3.yahoo.com>
In-Reply-To: <809254.81007.qm@web56809.mail.re3.yahoo.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: Martin Sebor <msebor@gmail.com>

pendiala jaipal wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> i tried to build apache standard library ( stdcxx-4.2.1) on HPUX(11iv2) with acc 3.80.
> I am getting these errors.

The error you pasted below is a future error that can be suppressed
via aCC's +W229 option. But unless these errors are also affecting
your programs I wouldn't be too concerned with them. The test is
probably buggy and needs to be fixed. There are a number of such
tests in our test suite and we've been working on cleaning them
up but we have ways to go.

FYI: You can see the test results on available platforms on this
page:

     http://stdcxx.apache.org/builds/4.2.1/

I don't see 17.extensions.cpp failing with either aCC 3.74 or with
6.16 but I do see similar errors on the 4.2.x branch:

   http://stdcxx.apache.org/builds/4.2.x/

It's possible that the 4.2.1 results are slightly out of date and
that a late change to the 4.2.1 branch might be responsible for
these errors. We'll need to investigate what caused the regression.
I opened a new issue to track this problem so feel free to subscribe
to it if you'd like to keep track of our progress on it.

   https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STDCXX-973

Martin

> 
> i used gmake CONFIG=acc.config
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
>         Error (future) 229: "/home/jaipal/Stdcxx/stdcxx-4.2.1/tests/intro/17.extensions.cpp", line 377 # "Ambiguous         overloaded function call; a function match was not found that was strictly best for ALL arguments. Two             functions that matched best for some arguments (but not all) were            "std::istreambuf_iterator<char,std::char_traits<char> >                    std::num_get<char,std::istreambuf_iterator<char,std::char_traits<char> >             >::get(std::istreambuf_iterator<char,std::char_traits<char>            >,std::istreambuf_iterator<char,std::char_traits<char> >,std::ios_base &,__rw::__rw_iostate &,long double &)             const" ["/home/jaipal/Stdcxx/stdcxx-4.2.1/include/loc/_num_get.h", line 124] and                 "std::istreambuf_iterator<char,std::char_traits<char> >              
>  std::num_get<char,std::istreambuf_iterator<char,std::char_traits<char> >          >::get(std::istreambuf_iterator<char,std::char_traits<char>         >,std::istreambuf_iterator<char,std::char_traits<char> >,std::ios_base &,__rw::__rw_iostate &,double &)             const" ["/home/jaipal/Stdcxx/stdcxx-4.2.1/include/loc/_num_get.h", line 116]." Choosing                   "std::istreambuf_iterator<char,std::char_traits<char> >                   std::num_get<char,std::istreambuf_iterator<char,std::char_traits<char> >           >::get(std::istreambuf_iterator<char,std::char_traits<char>           >,std::istreambuf_iterator<char,std::char_traits<char> >,std::ios_base &,__rw::__rw_iostate &,long double &)            const" ["/home/jaipal/Stdcxx/stdcxx-4.2.1/include/loc/_num_get.h", line 124] for resolving ambiguity.
>         Warning:        2 future errors were detected and ignored. Add a '+p' option to detect and fix them before               they become fatal errors in a future release. Behavior of this ill-formed program is not guaranteed to match           that of a well-formed program
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> 
> Thanks in Advance,
> Jaipal P.
> 
> 
> 
>