stdcxx-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Eric Lemings" <Eric.Lemi...@roguewave.com>
Subject RE: svn commit: r667636 - /stdcxx/branches/4.3.x/include/rw/_forward.h
Date Tue, 24 Jun 2008 15:21:23 GMT
 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Martin Sebor [mailto:sebor@roguewave.com] 
> Sent: Tuesday, June 24, 2008 9:00 AM
> To: dev@stdcxx.apache.org
> Subject: Re: svn commit: r667636 - 
> /stdcxx/branches/4.3.x/include/rw/_forward.h
> 
> Eric Lemings wrote:
> >  
> > 
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: Martin Sebor [mailto:sebor@roguewave.com] 
> >> Sent: Tuesday, June 24, 2008 6:55 AM
> >> To: dev@stdcxx.apache.org
> >> Subject: Re: svn commit: r667636 - 
> >> /stdcxx/branches/4.3.x/include/rw/_forward.h
> >>
> >> Eric Lemings wrote:
> > ...
> >>> BTW, I'm still trying to figure out what it is that you are 
> >> proposing 
> >>> exactly.  :D
> >> We have an established (albeit undocumented) process and
> >> infrastructure for documenting code and publishing the
> >> documentation. The onus is on you and Travis to come up
> >> with a proposal if you want to change how things are done.
> > 
> > I thought I did.  To repeat...for the record, write new 
> documentation
> > using Doxygen comments now.  Migrate the old HTML docs later.
> 
> Sorry. One sentence doesn't make a proposal, certainly not
> one this vague.

I can write a 1000 word, detailed proposal in about an hour if
that would do any good.  In the meantime, most of the details
are in the Jira issue.

http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STDCXX-964

> 
...
> The current process is to maintain the existing docs in HTML,
> using the existing infrastructure to publish the docs on the
> site. You want to change it? Fine. Propose in detail how and
> when this will change will take place and when we can expect
> it to be done.

Okay.

Brad.

Mime
View raw message