Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-stdcxx-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 2257 invoked from network); 5 Apr 2008 00:22:47 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 5 Apr 2008 00:22:47 -0000 Received: (qmail 60176 invoked by uid 500); 5 Apr 2008 00:22:48 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-stdcxx-dev-archive@stdcxx.apache.org Received: (qmail 60158 invoked by uid 500); 5 Apr 2008 00:22:47 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@stdcxx.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@stdcxx.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@stdcxx.apache.org Received: (qmail 60149 invoked by uid 99); 5 Apr 2008 00:22:47 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 04 Apr 2008 17:22:47 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [208.30.140.160] (HELO moroha.roguewave.com) (208.30.140.160) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 05 Apr 2008 00:22:06 +0000 Received: from exchmail01.Blue.Roguewave.Com (exchmail01.blue.roguewave.com [10.22.129.22]) by moroha.roguewave.com (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id m350MFTs025781 for ; Sat, 5 Apr 2008 00:22:16 GMT X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5 Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: RE: example DIFFs in Windows builds Date: Fri, 4 Apr 2008 18:22:24 -0600 Message-ID: X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: example DIFFs in Windows builds Thread-Index: AciWnmvB/014KWliQia4Rc7HOYqfhwAE5Eqw References: <47F69ECA.5070706@roguewave.com> <47F6A32E.1010707@roguewave.com> From: "Travis Vitek" To: X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org =20 >Andrew Black wrote: > >Greetings Martin. > >I haven't looked with a debugger, but my suspicion is that the new difs >are caused by http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=3D644314&view=3Drev . I >retrieved the results from a random build (34606522 - icl 10, Windows >XP, 12d, 4/1, r643226), and the failures are not observed. This >particular build occurred after >http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=3D643120&view=3Drev was checked in (my >resolution for STDCXX-426), but before Farid's change ( >http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=3D644314&view=3Drev ) was checked in. > >--Andrew Black Thanks Andrew. That looks like the problem. After spending over an hour wading through the windows build infrastructure, I finally got enough of an idea of what was going on so that I could test the change... The following command line ..\bin\exec -d c:\build\stdcxx\trunk\examples spell.exe radix.exe tele.exe Produces this output with Farid's change, NAME STATUS WARN ASSERTS FAILED PERCNT USER SYS REAL spell.exe DIFF 0 0.015 0.000 0.000 radix.exe DIFF 0 0.015 0.015 0.000 tele.exe DIFF 0 0.015 0.000 0.000 And produces this after removing it and rebuilding the exec utility. NAME STATUS WARN ASSERTS FAILED PERCNT USER SYS REAL spell.exe 0 0 0.015 0.000 0.000 radix.exe 0 0 0.015 0.000 0.000 tele.exe 0 0 0.015 0.000 0.000 I'll be committing a fix in a few seconds. Travis > >Martin Sebor wrote: >> Looks like all examples are being reported in the DIFF status >> in all recent Windows builds, including a few from this morning. >> I suspect it might have something to do with Andrew's recent >> patch to the exec utility. Andrew, or someone with access to >> a Windows machine, can you please look into this? It would >> be good to get this resolved before the weekend. >>=20 >> http://people.apache.org/~sebor/stdcxx/results/ >>=20 >> Thanks >> Martin >