Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-stdcxx-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 22035 invoked from network); 22 Apr 2008 23:49:15 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 22 Apr 2008 23:49:15 -0000 Received: (qmail 79101 invoked by uid 500); 22 Apr 2008 23:49:16 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-stdcxx-dev-archive@stdcxx.apache.org Received: (qmail 79079 invoked by uid 500); 22 Apr 2008 23:49:16 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@stdcxx.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@stdcxx.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@stdcxx.apache.org Received: (qmail 79068 invoked by uid 99); 22 Apr 2008 23:49:16 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 22 Apr 2008 16:49:16 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of msebor@gmail.com designates 209.85.198.231 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.198.231] (HELO rv-out-0506.google.com) (209.85.198.231) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 22 Apr 2008 23:48:29 +0000 Received: by rv-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id g37so1249185rvb.23 for ; Tue, 22 Apr 2008 16:48:43 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:organization:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:sender; bh=oVKFsRfwKxP0RX8Pd4KU/tNNgSMjaCaS6R7UCClFNsw=; b=EgHvnehlIxc/QEBQFIR67WeHL3wQnGOwkxlMRRRziGc8f4uaXsPu1+bOZ4QOCQrE3t+ma6iEPESN5b7hOxaI6ccL7SAsjACKuOAyyU+xbIBC+q8gYufC9NDTYCQkwgRuG0Qmus3VUntS6yY5CpxgeGe8QCZx2kW+xeUHEHCvcq4= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:organization:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:sender; b=HcoYdPY9i9XzP/mkYwAHDhmF9F0TvPxdcbLx+i1o8nCfqGYMrF6D7l7AjGuE72ceH7bw7fGOtwc3gAbC9PKrOq7YuxCNVsy8clng/bPi0TV8UWcAwlzXQ2SK1mn/E2ujwh6C6bcVs+yt8iRdhChwm58s/8VpKKy/EBcOar7gYPk= Received: by 10.141.162.9 with SMTP id p9mr80524rvo.68.1208908123492; Tue, 22 Apr 2008 16:48:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost.localdomain ( [71.229.200.170]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id k2sm8859647rvb.6.2008.04.22.16.48.41 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Tue, 22 Apr 2008 16:48:41 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <480E7958.4050404@roguewave.com> Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2008 17:48:40 -0600 From: Martin Sebor Organization: Rogue Wave Software, Inc. User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.12 (X11/20080226) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: dev@stdcxx.apache.org Subject: Re: Binary compatibility test results for Sun C++ 5.8 on Solaris 8 and 10 platforms References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: Martin Sebor X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Eric Lemings wrote: > > http://people.apache.org/~elemings/compat-test-results/ > > The diff files summarize the differences between the baseline tests > (i.e. matching lib and test versions) and the compat tests (i.e. > different lib and test versions) respectively. chess is a Solaris 10 > machine. antlia is a Solaris 8 machine. > > All in all, no real big problems that I see. I'm afraid I don't understand the output. Which is the result of running 4.2.0 tests with 4.2.1 lib, and which is the result of running 4.2.1 tests with 4.2.0 library? See, for example, Travis' post: http://www.mail-archive.com/dev@stdcxx.apache.org/msg00637.html Martin