Eric Lemings wrote:
> 
> There are some link errors in the tests on Solaris,

Can you post your results please?

FWIW, I ran the four sets of tests with Sun C++ 5.9 on Solaris
9/SPARC (4.2.0/4.2.0, 4.2.0/4.2.1, 4.2.1/4.2.0, and 4.2.1/4.2.1)
in 12d build type but didn't see any link errors. I'm out of time
to post the full results for reference but I'll do so tomorrow.

> one of which is the 
> new 22.locale.synopsis test which, I was under the impression was not to 
> be included in this patch release (along with the other migrated 
> tests).  Since it is a new test, its not so critical I think.  I'll file 
> an issue for this.
> 
> There are also runtime link errors on Darwin 8 and 9 (i.e. Tiger and 
> Leopard) due to incompatible library versions.  Example:
> 
>         [user@host tests]$ pwd
>         /private/tmp/stdcxx/build/tests
>         [user@host tests]$ otool -LD ./run
>         ./run:
>                 /tmp/stdcxx/build/lib/libstd.dylib (compatibility 
> version 4.0.0, current version 4.2.1)
>                 /usr/lib/libSystem.B.dylib (compatibility version 1.0.0, 
> current version 88.3.10)
>         [user@host tests]$ otool -LD /tmp/stdcxx/build/lib/libstd.dylib
>         /tmp/stdcxx/build/lib/libstd.dylib:
>                 /tmp/stdcxx/build/lib/libstd.dylib (compatibility 
> version 4.0.0, current version 4.2.1)
>                 /usr/lib/libSystem.B.dylib (compatibility version 1.0.0, 
> current version 88.3.10)
>         [user@host tests]$ ./run
>         dyld: Library not loaded: /tmp/stdcxx/build/lib/libstd.dylib
>           Referenced from: /private/tmp/stdcxx/build/tests/./run
>           Reason: Incompatible library version: run requires version 
> 4.0.0 or later, but libstd.dylib provides version 0.0.0
>         Trace/BPT trap
> 
> No clue where version 0.0.0 is coming from.  I'll file an issue for this 
> as well.
> 
> Finally, not many open source distributions do this but I find it really 
> useful when the permissions of all files in the distribution are set to 
> read-only when unpacked.  This is just polish though.
> 
> As for the vote: +1.
> 
> Brad.
> 
>  > -----Original Message-----
>  > From: Martin Sebor [mailto:msebor@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Martin Sebor
>  > Sent: Thursday, April 24, 2008 10:45 PM
>  > To: dev@stdcxx.apache.org
>  > Cc: user@stdcxx.apache.org
>  > Subject: [VOTE] stdcxx 4.2.1 release
>  >
>  > I've created a tarball with a release candiate of stdcxx 4.2.1.
>  >
>  > Tarball location:
>  > http://people.apache.org/~sebor/stdcxx-4.2.1-rc-3/stdcxx-4.2.1.tar.gz
>  >
>  > MD5 sum for the tarball:
>  > http://people.apache.org/~sebor/stdcxx-4.2.1-rc-3/stdcxx-4.2.1
>  > .tar.gz.md5
>  >
>  > Jira Release Notes:
>  > http://tinyurl.com/5ayny8
>  >
>  > Most recent available test results (-rc-2, -rc-3 in progress):
>  > http://people.apache.org/~sebor/stdcxx-4.2.1-rc-2/results/
>  > http://people.apache.org/~sebor/stdcxx-4.2.1-rc-2/results/builds.html
>  >
>  > Unpacking and installation instructions:
>  > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/stdcxx/tags/4.2.1-rc-3/README
>  >
>  > Please download and test the tarball on a platform of your choice,
>  > and send in your vote on this release candidate. In your vote, please
>  > identify the platform(s), their versions, and the stdcxx
>  > configurations
>  > you tested.
>  >
>  > As always, everyone is encouraged to vote, including non-committers.
>  >
>  > This vote will close in the usual 72 hours from now, i.e., on
>  > Tuesday, 10/23 at 5:00 PM US/Mountain time. Follow the following
>  > link for the countdown:  http://tinyurl.com/6r3fys
>  >