From dev-return-7479-apmail-stdcxx-dev-archive=stdcxx.apache.org@stdcxx.apache.org Tue Apr 29 04:56:43 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-stdcxx-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 4815 invoked from network); 29 Apr 2008 04:56:43 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 29 Apr 2008 04:56:43 -0000 Received: (qmail 8388 invoked by uid 500); 29 Apr 2008 04:56:44 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-stdcxx-dev-archive@stdcxx.apache.org Received: (qmail 8370 invoked by uid 500); 29 Apr 2008 04:56:44 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@stdcxx.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@stdcxx.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@stdcxx.apache.org Received: (qmail 8358 invoked by uid 99); 29 Apr 2008 04:56:44 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 28 Apr 2008 21:56:44 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of msebor@gmail.com designates 209.85.198.235 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.198.235] (HELO rv-out-0506.google.com) (209.85.198.235) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 29 Apr 2008 04:55:59 +0000 Received: by rv-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id g37so2765186rvb.23 for ; Mon, 28 Apr 2008 21:56:12 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:organization:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:sender; bh=ESnAfIdTRzNzHJ/nTDfc1nlaNvEr4pyGUkiHMt6u68U=; b=tWzV4cGkJo4eYa5lhtyuhJDAbFwPwAa8HvdLRsov2KiYVRJGKoDlapErETvJndi0nIpOhRpjTMTspUJg2qBbCXvnXPTl4jmCWCg4QKtGCmRAeu2OM1tiqGvGAGx4MLjtqxYL2L3BMxrEUsK3MkFVbCGDX6vTq8oKS1/U033lqSU= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:organization:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:sender; b=P+RdO9wBMN1Kjzw8MZG6/P6nB8qkAidG9mFAg5hi+FZpbXXZWaR0V3GMBaoQKYFXcnJ6K8TfBlEGARGGVdY/GwL1ErRHcFa1LCbFc5+Oemhgz6wZORl+24T2dVDowhQy4JCKIcXxgeS7ac8hdrs5pMHjKowBZivuMVxKBDYFlqo= Received: by 10.140.208.14 with SMTP id f14mr2897758rvg.204.1209444972406; Mon, 28 Apr 2008 21:56:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost.localdomain ( [71.229.200.170]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id f21sm8115212rvb.0.2008.04.28.21.56.11 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Mon, 28 Apr 2008 21:56:11 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4816AA6A.6000904@roguewave.com> Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2008 22:56:10 -0600 From: Martin Sebor Organization: Rogue Wave Software, Inc. User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.12 (X11/20080226) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: dev@stdcxx.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] stdcxx 4.2.1 release References: <481161B6.2020305@roguewave.com> <001B1BAD-BC9B-41BF-9E09-D98F28CA0425@roguewave.com> In-Reply-To: <001B1BAD-BC9B-41BF-9E09-D98F28CA0425@roguewave.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: Martin Sebor X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Eric Lemings wrote: > > There are some link errors in the tests on Solaris, Can you post your results please? FWIW, I ran the four sets of tests with Sun C++ 5.9 on Solaris 9/SPARC (4.2.0/4.2.0, 4.2.0/4.2.1, 4.2.1/4.2.0, and 4.2.1/4.2.1) in 12d build type but didn't see any link errors. I'm out of time to post the full results for reference but I'll do so tomorrow. > one of which is the > new 22.locale.synopsis test which, I was under the impression was not to > be included in this patch release (along with the other migrated > tests). Since it is a new test, its not so critical I think. I'll file > an issue for this. > > There are also runtime link errors on Darwin 8 and 9 (i.e. Tiger and > Leopard) due to incompatible library versions. Example: > > [user@host tests]$ pwd > /private/tmp/stdcxx/build/tests > [user@host tests]$ otool -LD ./run > ./run: > /tmp/stdcxx/build/lib/libstd.dylib (compatibility > version 4.0.0, current version 4.2.1) > /usr/lib/libSystem.B.dylib (compatibility version 1.0.0, > current version 88.3.10) > [user@host tests]$ otool -LD /tmp/stdcxx/build/lib/libstd.dylib > /tmp/stdcxx/build/lib/libstd.dylib: > /tmp/stdcxx/build/lib/libstd.dylib (compatibility > version 4.0.0, current version 4.2.1) > /usr/lib/libSystem.B.dylib (compatibility version 1.0.0, > current version 88.3.10) > [user@host tests]$ ./run > dyld: Library not loaded: /tmp/stdcxx/build/lib/libstd.dylib > Referenced from: /private/tmp/stdcxx/build/tests/./run > Reason: Incompatible library version: run requires version > 4.0.0 or later, but libstd.dylib provides version 0.0.0 > Trace/BPT trap > > No clue where version 0.0.0 is coming from. I'll file an issue for this > as well. > > Finally, not many open source distributions do this but I find it really > useful when the permissions of all files in the distribution are set to > read-only when unpacked. This is just polish though. > > As for the vote: +1. > > Brad. > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Martin Sebor [mailto:msebor@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Martin Sebor > > Sent: Thursday, April 24, 2008 10:45 PM > > To: dev@stdcxx.apache.org > > Cc: user@stdcxx.apache.org > > Subject: [VOTE] stdcxx 4.2.1 release > > > > I've created a tarball with a release candiate of stdcxx 4.2.1. > > > > Tarball location: > > http://people.apache.org/~sebor/stdcxx-4.2.1-rc-3/stdcxx-4.2.1.tar.gz > > > > MD5 sum for the tarball: > > http://people.apache.org/~sebor/stdcxx-4.2.1-rc-3/stdcxx-4.2.1 > > .tar.gz.md5 > > > > Jira Release Notes: > > http://tinyurl.com/5ayny8 > > > > Most recent available test results (-rc-2, -rc-3 in progress): > > http://people.apache.org/~sebor/stdcxx-4.2.1-rc-2/results/ > > http://people.apache.org/~sebor/stdcxx-4.2.1-rc-2/results/builds.html > > > > Unpacking and installation instructions: > > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/stdcxx/tags/4.2.1-rc-3/README > > > > Please download and test the tarball on a platform of your choice, > > and send in your vote on this release candidate. In your vote, please > > identify the platform(s), their versions, and the stdcxx > > configurations > > you tested. > > > > As always, everyone is encouraged to vote, including non-committers. > > > > This vote will close in the usual 72 hours from now, i.e., on > > Tuesday, 10/23 at 5:00 PM US/Mountain time. Follow the following > > link for the countdown: http://tinyurl.com/6r3fys > >