stdcxx-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Martin Sebor <se...@roguewave.com>
Subject Re: ABI test results with MSVC 8.0/Windows XP-64bit/12d
Date Wed, 30 Apr 2008 17:07:34 GMT
Farid Zaripov wrote:
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: Farid Zaripov [mailto:Farid_Zaripov@epam.com]
>>> Sent: Tuesday, April 22, 2008 5:27 AM
>>> To: dev@stdcxx.apache.org
>>> Subject: ABI test results with MSVC 8.0/Windows XP-64bit/12d
>>>
>>> msvc 8.0/WinXP-64bit/12d     SRC:   4.2.0   4.2.0   4.2.1   4.2.1
>>>                             LIB:   4.2.0   4.2.1   4.2.0   4.2.1
>>> limits                               DIFF       0
>>> random_shuffle                          0    DIFF
>>> 21.string.io.stdcxx-250                              ABRT    NOUT
>>> 21.string.stdcxx-231                                 ABRT    NOUT
>>> 22.locale.ctype.is                    331       0
>>> 22.locale.ctype.narrow                  0     381       5       0
>>> 22.locale.num.put                      96      24
>>> 22.locale.num.put.stdcxx-2                           ABRT    NOUT
>>> 27.basic.ios.copyfmt.stdcxx-766                      ABRT    NOUT
>>> 27.ostream.unformatted.stdcxx-626                    ABRT    NOUT
>>> 27.ostream                              2       0       2       0
>>> 27.streambuf.imbue.stdcxx-307                        ABRT    NOUT
>>> 27.stringbuf.overflow.stdcxx-795                     ABRT    NOUT
>>>
>>>
>>>  The results in 15d configuration and on icc 10.0 in 12d 
>> and 15d are 
>>> the same.
>>>
>>> Farid.
>>>
>> I'm curious what it means when nothing is shown in a cell. 
>> i.e. what were the results of the limits test for the last 
>> two configurations?
> 
>   Actually I have compared the src/lib pairs 4.2.0/4.2.0 vs 4.2.0/4.2.1
> only
> and then 4.2.1/4.2.1 vs 4.2.1/4.2.0 only. So empty cells means that the
> results has not changed due to replacing the library file.

But how can there be empty cells in the first and last columns
where the library wasn't replaced?

> 
>   As for the limits example results, I missed that the results has
> changed.
> Here the results for limits:
> 
> msvc 8.0/WinXP-64bit/12d     SRC:   4.2.0   4.2.0   4.2.1   4.2.1
>                              LIB:   4.2.0   4.2.1   4.2.0   4.2.1
> limits                               DIFF       0    DIFF       0

And this is a good thing! It means that 4.2.1 fixes whatever
was causing the DIFF in 4.2.0 :)

Martin

Mime
View raw message