stdcxx-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Martin Sebor <se...@roguewave.com>
Subject Re: [VOTE] stdcxx 4.2.1 release
Date Wed, 30 Apr 2008 17:03:23 GMT
Eric Lemings wrote:
>  
> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Martin Sebor [mailto:sebor@roguewave.com] 
>> Sent: Monday, April 28, 2008 10:01 AM
>> To: dev@stdcxx.apache.org
>> Subject: Re: [VOTE] stdcxx 4.2.1 release
>>
>> Eric Lemings wrote:
>>> There are some link errors in the tests on Solaris, one of 
>> which is the 
>>> new 22.locale.synopsis test which, I was under the 
>> impression was not to 
>>> be included in this patch release (along with the other migrated 
>>> tests).
>> It's not included. Are you sure you tested the release candidate
>> tarball and not something else?
>>
>> $ wget -q 
>> http://people.apache.org/~sebor/stdcxx-4.2.1-rc-3/stdcxx-4.2.1
>> .tar.gz && 
>> gunzip -c stdcxx-4.2.1.tar.gz | tar -tvf - | grep 
>> 22\.locale\.synopsis 
>> || echo NOT FOUND
>> NOT FOUND
> 
> That was it.  I must have been testing a previous release candidate.
> In the test that I just did on Solaris, I found only the link error
> for the 26.valarray.binary.stdcxx-237 test that is being reported in
> the nightly test results.
> 
> http://people.apache.org/~sebor/stdcxx/results/builds/solaris-10-sparc-s
> unpro-5.9.html

That's XCOMP, i.e., an expected compilation error, not a link
error. The difference is crucial because link errors are the
first indicator of possible binary incompatibilities.

Martin

Mime
View raw message