Eric Lemings wrote:
>
> On Apr 28, 2008, at 10:00 AM, Martin Sebor wrote:
>> Does this mean that stdcxx 4.2.1 isn't binary compatible with
>> 4.2.0 on Darwin or that there is a problem with a dependency
>> on some system library or something like that? (I can't tell
>> for sure from the output you pasted below.) Either way, is
>> this something new? (I don't recall it being mentioned when
>> we did our binary compatibility testing two weeks ago.)
>
> It's most likely a problem with the way the library is built.
Could STDCXX-488 have something to do with it?
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STDCXX-488
>
> The first time I saw it was a couple weeks ago while testing binary
> compatibility.
And you waited to mention it until now because...?
|