Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-stdcxx-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 40191 invoked from network); 19 Mar 2008 16:52:18 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 19 Mar 2008 16:52:18 -0000 Received: (qmail 14333 invoked by uid 500); 19 Mar 2008 16:52:16 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-stdcxx-dev-archive@stdcxx.apache.org Received: (qmail 14320 invoked by uid 500); 19 Mar 2008 16:52:16 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@stdcxx.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@stdcxx.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@stdcxx.apache.org Received: (qmail 14311 invoked by uid 99); 19 Mar 2008 16:52:16 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 19 Mar 2008 09:52:16 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [208.30.140.160] (HELO moroha.roguewave.com) (208.30.140.160) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 19 Mar 2008 16:51:37 +0000 Received: from exchmail01.Blue.Roguewave.Com (exchmail01.blue.roguewave.com [10.22.129.22]) by moroha.roguewave.com (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id m2JGpkDX026678 for ; Wed, 19 Mar 2008 16:51:46 GMT Received: from EXCHWEB01.Blue.Roguewave.Com ([10.22.0.12]) by exchmail01.Blue.Roguewave.Com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Wed, 19 Mar 2008 10:52:23 -0600 Received: from [192.168.40.104] ([71.234.39.191]) by EXCHWEB01.Blue.Roguewave.Com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Wed, 19 Mar 2008 09:52:22 -0700 Message-ID: <47E144A5.6000100@roguewave.com> Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2008 12:51:49 -0400 From: Liviu Nicoara User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (X11/20071031) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: dev@stdcxx.apache.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] atomic ops on _PA_RISC2_0 References: <7BDB2168BEAEF14C98F1901FD2DE643801D88833@epmsa009.minsk.epam.com> <47E140DD.6090507@roguewave.com> In-Reply-To: <47E140DD.6090507@roguewave.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 19 Mar 2008 16:52:22.0998 (UTC) FILETIME=[9A552F60:01C889E1] X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Martin Sebor wrote: > Farid Zaripov wrote: >> Why if _PA_RISC2_0 macro is defined the atimic functions are named >> __rw_string_atomic_xxx() but no __rw_atomic_xxx() as on other platforms? > > I'm not sure but I wonder if the PA atomic functions aren't > the ones that reserve a specific value as the lock value. > I.e., they're not completely general as on all the other > architectures. [...] That is correct, PA-RISC atomic instructions set use 0 as a special value. But I do not know if stdcxx choice of names is related to that. Liviu