stdcxx-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Travis Vitek <>
Subject Re: regression in set::insert() (was: Re: __rw::__string_ref::size sigsegv)
Date Thu, 20 Mar 2008 22:56:42 GMT

Martin Sebor wrote:
> Travis Vitek wrote:
>> Martin Sebor wrote:
>>> I suspect the SEGV discussed in the thread below is due to the patch
>>> for STDCXX-216:
>>> Reverting the patch makes the error go away. Travis, can you look
>>> into it when you have a moment please?
>>> Thanks
>>> Martin
>> Yes, I see the error. I'm creating a patch and a regression test right
>> now. 
> Thanks!
> We'll need to take some time to write robust tests for the associative
> containers, just like Farid did for sequences last year. Otherwise it's
> far to easy to inadvertently introduce regressions. The tests we have
> are probably completely inadequate.
> We also need to put together some sort of a regression hunter. With all
> the failures we still have in our test suite it's impossible to tell if
> one or more of them is a regression.
> Martin

Committed to trunk in

View this message in context:
Sent from the stdcxx-dev mailing list archive at

View raw message