Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-stdcxx-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 8199 invoked from network); 7 Feb 2008 23:54:38 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 7 Feb 2008 23:54:38 -0000 Received: (qmail 6292 invoked by uid 500); 7 Feb 2008 23:54:31 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-stdcxx-dev-archive@stdcxx.apache.org Received: (qmail 6273 invoked by uid 500); 7 Feb 2008 23:54:31 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@stdcxx.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@stdcxx.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@stdcxx.apache.org Received: (qmail 6264 invoked by uid 99); 7 Feb 2008 23:54:31 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 07 Feb 2008 15:54:31 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.2 required=10.0 tests=SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [64.202.165.33] (HELO smtpauth11.prod.mesa1.secureserver.net) (64.202.165.33) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Thu, 07 Feb 2008 23:54:13 +0000 Received: (qmail 8802 invoked from network); 7 Feb 2008 23:54:02 -0000 Received: from unknown (67.162.45.134) by smtpauth11.prod.mesa1.secureserver.net (64.202.165.33) with ESMTP; 07 Feb 2008 23:54:02 -0000 Message-ID: <47AB9A19.50409@rowe-clan.net> Date: Thu, 07 Feb 2008 17:54:01 -0600 From: "William A. Rowe, Jr." User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (X11/20071115) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: dev@stdcxx.apache.org Subject: Re: [Fwd: JIRA now hooked up to Fisheye] References: <47AB86F8.3090006@roguewave.com> In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Travis Vitek wrote: > > Is it necessary or useful? Does it do anything to reduce our workload, > add to it, or is it totally transparent to those who don't use it? What > are the administration costs? as far as I understand, CIA.vc, fisheye etc all are interesting ways to peer into svn or announce its results. But none of these sorts of tools add headaches to the typical participant in a project.