| Martin Sebor |
Re: 0.printf still failing on AIX |
Thu, 24 Jan, 17:03 |
| Eric Lemings |
RE: stdcxx move to TLP complete |
Thu, 24 Jan, 17:49 |
| Eric Lemings |
RE: stdcxx move to TLP complete |
Thu, 24 Jan, 17:58 |
| Martin Sebor |
Re: stdcxx move to TLP complete |
Thu, 24 Jan, 18:17 |
| Travis Vitek |
Discussion for STDCXX-573 |
Thu, 24 Jan, 19:13 |
| Eric Lemings |
RE: Discussion for STDCXX-573 |
Thu, 24 Jan, 19:37 |
| Martin Sebor |
Re: Discussion for STDCXX-573 |
Thu, 24 Jan, 19:58 |
| Andrew Black |
Re: Discussion for STDCXX-573 |
Thu, 24 Jan, 20:26 |
| Travis Vitek |
Re: Discussion for STDCXX-573 |
Thu, 24 Jan, 23:38 |
| Eric Lemings |
RE: Discussion for STDCXX-573 |
Fri, 25 Jan, 00:04 |
| Martin Sebor |
Re: Discussion for STDCXX-573 |
Fri, 25 Jan, 00:29 |
| Martin Sebor |
Re: stdcxx move to TLP complete |
Fri, 25 Jan, 01:23 |
| Travis Vitek |
RE: time tracking in Jira |
Sat, 26 Jan, 01:48 |
| Gav.... |
RE: time tracking in Jira |
Sat, 26 Jan, 12:49 |
| Martin Sebor |
Re: [VOTE] discontinue supporting of the MSVC 7.0 |
Sat, 26 Jan, 17:39 |
| Martin Sebor |
Re: time tracking in Jira |
Sat, 26 Jan, 17:55 |
| Tim Adams |
RE: [VOTE] discontinue supporting of the MSVC 7.0 |
Sat, 26 Jan, 18:37 |
| William A. Rowe, Jr. |
Re: [VOTE] discontinue supporting of the MSVC 7.0 |
Sat, 26 Jan, 18:55 |
| William A. Rowe, Jr. |
Re: [VOTE] discontinue supporting of the MSVC 7.0 |
Sat, 26 Jan, 19:00 |
| Martin Sebor |
Re: [VOTE] discontinue supporting of the MSVC 7.0 |
Sat, 26 Jan, 19:10 |
| William A. Rowe, Jr. |
Re: [VOTE] discontinue supporting of the MSVC 7.0 |
Sat, 26 Jan, 19:18 |
| Martin Sebor |
Re: [VOTE] discontinue supporting of the MSVC 7.0 |
Sat, 26 Jan, 19:32 |
| William A. Rowe, Jr. |
Re: [VOTE] discontinue supporting of the MSVC 7.0 |
Sat, 26 Jan, 19:50 |
| Travis Vitek |
Re: [VOTE] discontinue supporting of the MSVC 7.0 |
Sat, 26 Jan, 20:42 |
| Martin Sebor |
Re: low hanging fruit while cleaning up test failures |
Sun, 27 Jan, 00:33 |
| Liviu Nicoara |
Re: [VOTE] discontinue supporting of the MSVC 7.0 |
Sun, 27 Jan, 13:49 |
| Farid Zaripov |
RE: low hanging fruit while cleaning up test failures |
Mon, 28 Jan, 15:09 |
| Eric Lemings |
RE: [VOTE] discontinue supporting of the MSVC 7.0 |
Mon, 28 Jan, 17:20 |
| Eric Lemings |
RE: [jira] Commented: (STDCXX-691) Global 'size_t' type in source file 'tests/regress/27.stringbuf.xsputn.stdcxx-515.cpp'. |
Mon, 28 Jan, 17:28 |
| Scott Zhong |
RE: [VOTE] discontinue supporting of the MSVC 7.0 |
Mon, 28 Jan, 17:33 |
| Farid Zaripov |
RE: [jira] Commented: (STDCXX-691) Global 'size_t' type in source file 'tests/regress/27.stringbuf.xsputn.stdcxx-515.cpp'. |
Mon, 28 Jan, 17:48 |
| Travis Vitek |
RE: low hanging fruit while cleaning up test failures |
Mon, 28 Jan, 17:53 |
| Martin Sebor |
Re: [jira] Resolved: (STDCXX-691) Global 'size_t' type in source file 'tests/regress/27.stringbuf.xsputn.stdcxx-515.cpp'. |
Mon, 28 Jan, 17:56 |
| Martin Sebor |
Reply-To for issues@stdcxx.a.o |
Mon, 28 Jan, 18:03 |
| Travis Vitek |
RE: Reply-To for issues@stdcxx.a.o |
Mon, 28 Jan, 18:14 |
| Farid Zaripov |
RE: Reply-To for issues@stdcxx.a.o |
Mon, 28 Jan, 18:14 |
| Farid Zaripov |
0.fnmatch failures on MSVC and ICC/Windows |
Mon, 28 Jan, 18:25 |
| Martin Sebor |
Re: svn commit: r616003 - /stdcxx/branches/4.2.x/tests/utilities/20.temp.buffer.cpp |
Mon, 28 Jan, 20:26 |
| Travis Vitek |
Re: svn commit: r616003 - /stdcxx/branches/4.2.x/tests/utilities/20.temp.buffer.cpp |
Tue, 29 Jan, 07:09 |
| Travis Vitek |
Re: 0.fnmatch failures on MSVC and ICC/Windows |
Tue, 29 Jan, 07:41 |
| Farid Zaripov |
RE: svn commit: r616003 - /stdcxx/branches/4.2.x/tests/utilities/20.temp.buffer.cpp |
Tue, 29 Jan, 13:10 |
| Martin Sebor |
Re: svn commit: r616003 - /stdcxx/branches/4.2.x/tests/utilities/20.temp.buffer.cpp |
Tue, 29 Jan, 15:46 |
| Martin Sebor |
Re: svn commit: r616003 - /stdcxx/branches/4.2.x/tests/utilities/20.temp.buffer.cpp |
Tue, 29 Jan, 15:55 |
| Farid Zaripov |
RE: svn commit: r616003 - /stdcxx/branches/4.2.x/tests/utilities/20.temp.buffer.cpp |
Tue, 29 Jan, 16:14 |
| Martin Sebor |
Re: svn commit: r616003 - /stdcxx/branches/4.2.x/tests/utilities/20.temp.buffer.cpp |
Tue, 29 Jan, 16:27 |
| Farid Zaripov |
RE: svn commit: r616003 - /stdcxx/branches/4.2.x/tests/utilities/20.temp.buffer.cpp |
Tue, 29 Jan, 16:31 |
| Martin Sebor |
Re: svn commit: r616003 - /stdcxx/branches/4.2.x/tests/utilities/20.temp.buffer.cpp |
Tue, 29 Jan, 16:35 |
| Farid Zaripov |
RE: svn commit: r616003 - /stdcxx/branches/4.2.x/tests/utilities/20.temp.buffer.cpp |
Tue, 29 Jan, 17:03 |
| Martin Sebor |
Re: svn commit: r616003 - /stdcxx/branches/4.2.x/tests/utilities/20.temp.buffer.cpp |
Tue, 29 Jan, 17:11 |
| Travis Vitek |
RE: svn commit: r616003 - /stdcxx/branches/4.2.x/tests/utilities/20.temp.buffer.cpp |
Tue, 29 Jan, 17:27 |
| Farid Zaripov |
Whether the compatibility policy applies to other stdcxx components besides just the library? |
Tue, 29 Jan, 17:54 |
| Scott Zhong |
[PATCH] STDCXX-705 |
Tue, 29 Jan, 20:22 |
| Scott Zhong |
RE: [PATCH] STDCXX-705 |
Tue, 29 Jan, 20:29 |
| Martin Sebor |
Re: [PATCH] STDCXX-705 |
Tue, 29 Jan, 21:13 |
| Travis Vitek |
RE: [PATCH] STDCXX-705 |
Tue, 29 Jan, 21:15 |
| Travis Vitek |
RE: [PATCH] STDCXX-705 |
Tue, 29 Jan, 21:45 |
| Scott Zhong |
RE: [PATCH] STDCXX-705 |
Tue, 29 Jan, 21:49 |
| Martin Sebor |
Re: [PATCH] STDCXX-705 |
Tue, 29 Jan, 22:04 |
| Martin Sebor |
Re: [PATCH] STDCXX-705 |
Tue, 29 Jan, 22:07 |
| Scott Zhong |
RE: [PATCH] STDCXX-705 |
Tue, 29 Jan, 22:25 |
| Travis Vitek |
Re: [PATCH] STDCXX-705 |
Tue, 29 Jan, 22:59 |
| Martin Sebor |
Re: [PATCH] STDCXX-705 |
Wed, 30 Jan, 00:55 |
| Martin Sebor |
Re: svn commit: r615419 - in /stdcxx/trunk: GNUmakefile etc/config/makefile.rules |
Wed, 30 Jan, 05:14 |
| Scott Zhong |
RE: [PATCH] STDCXX-705 |
Wed, 30 Jan, 16:33 |
| Scott Zhong |
[PATCH] STDCXX-563 |
Wed, 30 Jan, 16:57 |
| Scott Zhong |
[PATCH] STDCXX-423 |
Wed, 30 Jan, 20:44 |
| Scott Zhong |
RE: [PATCH] STDCXX-705 |
Wed, 30 Jan, 20:52 |
| Ravi Inampudi |
"omanip" in C++ standard library |
Wed, 30 Jan, 23:07 |
| Martin Sebor |
Re: "omanip" in C++ standard library |
Thu, 31 Jan, 00:28 |
| Travis Vitek |
Re: "omanip" in C++ standard library |
Thu, 31 Jan, 00:59 |
| Travis Vitek |
Re: "omanip" in C++ standard library |
Thu, 31 Jan, 01:01 |
| Martin Sebor |
Re: [PATCH] STDCXX-705 |
Thu, 31 Jan, 01:16 |
| Martin Sebor |
Re: Whether the compatibility policy applies to other stdcxx components besides just the library? |
Thu, 31 Jan, 01:41 |
| Martin Sebor |
Re: low hanging fruit while cleaning up test failures |
Thu, 31 Jan, 06:04 |