Mailing-List: contact stdcxx-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: stdcxx-dev@incubator.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of Farid_Zaripov@epam.com
 designates 217.21.63.3 as permitted sender)
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Subject: RE: mailing list for Jira issues?
Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2007 20:06:13 +0200
Message-ID: <7BDB2168BEAEF14C98F1901FD2DE6438015C5F3E@epmsa009.minsk.epam.com>
In-Reply-To: <14260442.post@talk.nabble.com>
Thread-Topic: mailing list for Jira issues?
Thread-Index: Acg7Z1JCg6I2JKd6QKWK/L3LbdfA/gBgdOSw
References: <475CE829.9040909@roguewave.com> <14257741.post@talk.nabble.com>
 <7BDB2168BEAEF14C98F1901FD2DE643801511F2D@epmsa009.minsk.epam.com>
 <14260442.post@talk.nabble.com>
From: "Farid Zaripov" <Farid_Zaripov@epam.com>
To: <stdcxx-dev@incubator.apache.org>

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Travis Vitek [mailto:vitek@roguewave.com]=20
> Sent: Monday, December 10, 2007 10:00 PM
> To: stdcxx-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: RE: mailing list for Jira issues?

> >   I'm using the MS Outlook and filtering the JIRA messages by the=20
> > "[jira]"
> > in subject. But any reply to jira messages with "Re: [jira]" in=20
> > subject are filtered also :( And Outlook dosn't provide the=20
> > possibility to make more flexible rule :(
> >=20
> > Farid.
> >=20
>=20
> I don't know how the infra group will set this up, but I=20
> wouldn't expect the addition of a new list to fix this=20
> problem for you. All generated messages from jira would come=20
> from the user that modified the case and be sent to the=20
> stdcxx-issues@apache.org list. Any response would appear the=20
> same. This is how it works now.

  But what the sense to send the response to stdcxx-issues@apache.org
and not to stdcxx-dev@apache.org?

> Also, I believe that Outlook rules allow you to make a rule=20
> handle this situation. You just add an exception to your rule=20
> that checks for the strings "RE:" or "Re:".

  I forget about the "rule exceptions" and tried to make the rule
using the "rule conditions" only.

  Thanks! :)

Farid.