Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-stdcxx-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 267 invoked from network); 10 Dec 2007 17:38:41 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 10 Dec 2007 17:38:41 -0000 Received: (qmail 85590 invoked by uid 500); 10 Dec 2007 17:38:30 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-stdcxx-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 85530 invoked by uid 500); 10 Dec 2007 17:38:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact stdcxx-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: stdcxx-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list stdcxx-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 85519 invoked by uid 99); 10 Dec 2007 17:38:29 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 10 Dec 2007 09:38:29 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [208.30.140.160] (HELO moroha.roguewave.com) (208.30.140.160) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 10 Dec 2007 17:38:32 +0000 Received: from [10.70.3.58] ([10.70.3.58]) by moroha.roguewave.com (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id lBAHc9Wr003007 for ; Mon, 10 Dec 2007 17:38:10 GMT Message-ID: <475D7981.1060808@roguewave.com> Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2007 10:38:09 -0700 From: Andrew Black User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.12 (X11/20060911) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: stdcxx-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: mailing list for Jira issues? References: <475CE829.9040909@roguewave.com> In-Reply-To: <475CE829.9040909@roguewave.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Martin Sebor wrote: > STDCXX-546 suggests we create a separate mailing list to reflect Jira > traffic to so as to relieve stdcxx-dev from all the traffic. Since we > have just asked INFRA to move our mailing lists from the Incubator to > TLP (https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-1422) this would be > a good time to make this change. > > How does everyone feel about it? I would support this change (and filed a vote for the issue in Jira to reflect this). While it'd be possible to filter the jira messages without having a separate list, the filtering would be more reliable with having a separate list. --Andrew Black > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STDCXX-546 >