stdcxx-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Tim Adams" <>
Subject RE: timeframe for 4.2.1?
Date Mon, 05 Nov 2007 19:07:16 GMT
Hi Martin,

I don't know what is on your 4.2.1 agenda yet, but I thought I'd suggest
that the _RWSTD_* style macros be replaced by _STDCXX_* or something
similar for clarity.  Is this already on your list of tasks for 4.2.1? 

-- Tim

-----Original Message-----
From: Martin Sebor [] On Behalf Of Martin Sebor
Sent: Sunday, November 04, 2007 11:36 PM
Subject: timeframe for 4.2.1?

For 4.2.1, I'd like us to follow the [still only proposed] release
process, i.e., clean up all assertions on primary platforms and all
other types of failures (compiler + linker) on secondary and best effort
platforms. Is the third week of December doable or is it too aggressive?


View raw message