stdcxx-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Farid Zaripov" <Farid_Zari...@epam.com>
Subject RE: [RFC] stdcxx release process
Date Wed, 07 Nov 2007 14:56:18 GMT
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Martin Sebor [mailto:sebor@roguewave.com] 
> Sent: Tuesday, November 06, 2007 2:16 AM
> To: stdcxx-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [RFC] stdcxx release process
> 
> William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
> > Travis Vitek wrote:
> >>
> >> Section 2 [Roles During a Release] Paragraph 1 Sentence 6 reads
> >>     Changes to the Release Criteria require the consent of all 
> >> committers.
> > 
> > I agree with Travis' concerns.
> > 
> > I'd hint for something like "requires consensus of the committers.
> 
> Agreed.
> 
> > In order to ensure that all committers have a voice in the 
> discussion, 
> > Release Criteria votes will run no less than 10 days."
> 
> 10 days sounds long but I can see how the usual 72 hours 
> wouldn't be nearly long enough. I'll put that in, thanks.
> 
> > 
> > It should go without saying that discussion happens on dev@.
> 
> Right. It doesn't hurt to mention it.
> 
> > 
> > So no, a committer might be overruled if the vast majority 
> of the PMC 
> > votes in favor of the change.  But their voice should be heard and 
> > respected, and their concerns addressed if possible.
> 
> Agreed.

  I agree with all corrections above and have nothing to append.

Farid.

Mime
View raw message