faridz@apache.org wrote:
> Author: faridz
> Date: Thu Nov 22 04:40:33 2007
> New Revision: 597396
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=597396&view=rev
> Log:
> 2007-11-22 Farid Zaripov <farid_zaripov@epam.com>
>
> * 26.valarray.cassign.cpp (run_test): Corrected condition in preprocessor directive.
Good catch, thanks!
We should probably bump up _RWSTD_VER on trunk. To what, though?
It might also be a good idea to always set the macro so that it can't
match that of any branch. Any ideas how to do that?
Martin
>
> Modified:
> incubator/stdcxx/branches/4.2.x/tests/numerics/26.valarray.cassign.cpp
>
> Modified: incubator/stdcxx/branches/4.2.x/tests/numerics/26.valarray.cassign.cpp
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/incubator/stdcxx/branches/4.2.x/tests/numerics/26.valarray.cassign.cpp?rev=597396&r1=597395&r2=597396&view=diff
> ==============================================================================
> --- incubator/stdcxx/branches/4.2.x/tests/numerics/26.valarray.cassign.cpp (original)
> +++ incubator/stdcxx/branches/4.2.x/tests/numerics/26.valarray.cassign.cpp Thu Nov 22
04:40:33 2007
> @@ -805,7 +805,7 @@
> TEST (int);
> TEST (double);
>
> -#if 0x04020000 <= _RWSTD_VER
> +#if 0x04020000 >= _RWSTD_VER
>
> // test fails to compile with stdcxx 4.2.0 and prior due to
> // STDCXX-512: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STDCXX-512
>
>
>
|