stdcxx-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Travis Vitek <>
Subject Re: [RFC] stdcxx release process, second draft
Date Thu, 29 Nov 2007 18:41:11 GMT

Martin Sebor wrote:
> Martin Sebor wrote:
>> So here's a question: do we think STDCXX-336 doable for 4.2.1?
> Also, what's your take on STDCXX-242 and STDCXX-343? I think there
> might be others where it's not completely clear (at least to me)
> what is forward compatible and what's not.

STDCXX-343 is quite source incompatible. It is one of those weird cases that
I can't imagine that a user would intentionally write, and even if they did
they might not get the results that they want (undefined behavior).

View this message in context:
Sent from the stdcxx-dev mailing list archive at

View raw message