Farid Zaripov wrote:
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: William A. Rowe, Jr. [mailto:wrowe@rowe-clan.net] 
>> Sent: Monday, October 29, 2007 11:34 PM
>> To: stdcxx-dev@incubator.apache.org
>> Subject: Re: svn commit: r588290 - 
>> /incubator/stdcxx/branches/4.2.x/etc/config/windows/projectdef.js
>>
>> William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
>>> patched, but combining them may lead to some unstable 
>> results and also 
>>> bloated .pdb's without benefits to the debugger (?).
>> Footnote - source .pdb's for a static .lib file that you 
>> distribute /are/ interesting to the end user, but you 
>> shouldn't generate one source pdb anyways for both the static 
>> and dynamic compilation of the library.
> 
>   The pdb for the static compilation and pdb for the dynamic
> compilation are different files.

Because the sources are or may be different depending on
the setting of the _RWSTDDEBUG macro, correct?

Sounds from what Bill is saying like APR is the same regardless.
Do the Microsoft libraries come with distinct .pdb files for
archive and shared libraries?

Martin